12-06-2017 06:48 - last edited on 03-23-2021 04:01 by JuanJoFitbit
12-06-2017 06:48 - last edited on 03-23-2021 04:01 by JuanJoFitbit
I recently completed an in-depth bio metrics analysis using a BodPod, the most accurate commercial analysis on the market, and learned I had 17% body fat. The Aria 2 tells me I have 29.5% body fat. I am a fitness instructor and muscular body type and believe the first number is more accurate. Is anyone else having this same issue? Or does my Aria 2 need to be returned?
Moderator edit: updated subject for clarity
12-21-2017 06:53
12-21-2017 06:53
It has to be a calibration issue, some units show reasonable measurements others don't... My scale puts me at 23% BF. At the same time I somewhat visible abs, veins on forearms, biceps and shoulders, i.e not how an obese person looks like. Old-school measurements put me closer to 15-17%, that's a difference of 5-8% which is ridiculous...
I'll be keeping my scale as I didn't have any prior to getting my Aria 2 and I do like the sync functionality quite a bit...
12-21-2017 07:10
12-21-2017 07:10
You've proven my earlier point about our unchallenged love of technology. As long as the "inaccurate" data is sync'd, that's ok? I personally can't accept that.
12-21-2017 07:19
12-21-2017 07:19
The wight is accurate and it is sync'd into my app so I can track it in a nice graph... While I would be able to do the same with an analogue scale and excel, Aria does that for me automatically without any hick-ups. So they got that right at least. Heck, I don't own another scale...
Point me to a competitor with this functionality around the same price point and I might reconsider... Until then I'll stick with my Aria 2, thanks.
12-21-2017 07:30
12-21-2017 07:30
I understand your stance completely. My point is simply that any products value (forget the price) is based on reliability and consistency. The fact that it works for "some" people but not for others does not provide me with a vote of confidence. I would have liked to see a more positive response from Fitbit regarding the why's of poor performance.
12-21-2017 07:45
12-21-2017 07:45
Indeed, we're all waiting for a fitbit representative to address this issue... I am not holding my breath unfortunately...
12-21-2017 07:48
12-21-2017 07:48
Consider this workaround - you weigh yourself on a medical balance beam scale at 180 lbs. You weigh yourself on the Aria 2 at 182.5 lbs. Wouldn't a software tweak be great where you enter a 2.5 lb. compensation number into your dashboard. Corrects the problem. Later, if the variance changes, re-enter the factor. This could be a positive or negative compensator.
12-22-2017 16:03
12-22-2017 16:03
As mentioned in this thread, if your body fat seems to be too high switching the scale to lean mode is recommended, even if you do not consider yourself a high-performance athlete, it seems to be more accurate for some. If your body fat percentage seems too low, check if it is in lean mode, you should then likely switch to regular.
Other tips:
Please note, Aria and Aria 2 estimate your body fat percentage using body impedance. Because several different methods can determine body fat percentage and none are 100% accurate, the scale's body fat reading may not perfectly match other scales or manual methods such as calipers.
Actively managing your weight? Find accountability buddies on the Manage Weight board
12-29-2017 10:31
12-29-2017 10:31
I’m having the same issue it’s way off. I know that calculating big boned people is different for calculating BMI and body fat % but there is no way I’m 44% Body Fat! When I calculate using body measurements and bio markers I calculate my Body fat = 24.9 %.
this is an expensive scale that makes grand claims about its product features. Hopefully this can be calibrated?
12-29-2017 11:01
12-29-2017 11:01
@AntoPod wrote:I’m having the same issue it’s way off. I know that calculating big boned people is different for calculating BMI and body fat % but there is no way I’m 44% Body Fat! When I calculate using body measurements and bio markers I calculate my Body fat = 24.9 %.
this is an expensive scale that makes grand claims about its product features. Hopefully this can be calibrated?
I offered what I thought would be a workable solution. The ability to enter a one time calibration number into our dashboard. My scale is off by +1.5 lbs. If I could enter -1.5 into the program, my problem is solved. Why couldn't the same be done for body fat%
12-29-2017 11:22
12-29-2017 11:22
01-01-2018 09:02
01-01-2018 09:02
Here is what fixed this problem for me,
My scale first showed that I was at 35% body fat. Which is highly unlikely. So I pinged Fitbit, and they suggested I change my settings to "lean." I did so, and now I am at 25% body fat. Again, highly unlikely. So I sent the scale back and got another one.
Same issue with he new scale. Which was very frustrating. So much so, that I was about to send the scale back, again,
Then I noticed that when I signed onto my dashboard, it flagged me to complete my profile and sellect my gender. When I looked, it stated male. Yet this Flagg came up every time,
Thinking this might be the issue, I selected my gender as female, saved it, and then went back in and selected my gender back to male.
The "complete profile" flag went away, and my scale now reads a body fat percentage of 13%.
Hopefully this can help others with working out this very frustrating issue.
Regards,
01-04-2018 06:57
01-04-2018 06:57
I found the same thing. My previous scale was measuring me around 23% body fat. First time on the Aria 2 showed my body fat at 27.2%. Not quite as extreme as your situation, but still alarming. I double checked my settings to confirm my gender and height were correct which they were. Planning to try switching to "Lean" mode to see how that measures, but seems more like a Band-Aid than a true fix. Considering returning for another brand. Fortunately I purchased from Amazon so returning shouldn't be an issue. Very disappointed.
01-04-2018 11:07
01-04-2018 11:07
01-04-2018 16:47
01-04-2018 16:47
My details taken at the same time/weight:
DEXA scan estimated body fat 26%
Aria 2 estimated body fat 34%
I agree with other posts. The body fat percentage IS wildly inaccurate. It is counterproductive for a health promoting device to state my body fat percentage is 31% higher than it actually is.
I would like Fitbit to provide evidence to this forum that they have calibrated/proven their expensive device is accurate and consistent with their marketing. Where is Fitbit's proof?
And yes, like other users I have:
Checked my profile height, weight and gender are correct,
Placed the scale on a flat tile floor, not stored on its side,
Weigh using bare feet,
Reset the device by taking batteries out, and
Measured at least 5 times since reset.
01-04-2018 23:12
01-04-2018 23:12
@Ash_S wrote:
I already have sent it back, and they said I should foot the bill (£42!!!)
UK (and as far as I know European) law states that Fitbit must pay for return postage if the item is faulty.
01-08-2018 21:29 - last edited on 03-22-2021 04:59 by JuanJoFitbit
01-08-2018 21:29 - last edited on 03-22-2021 04:59 by JuanJoFitbit
I was reading today that athletes or more athletic people will need to change their settings to "lean" in order for the BMI or BFP to be accurate.
I would say looking at the charts below, if you are at or under what the underfoot number for your age group is then you may need to change to the lean setting to get more accurate results.
Women:
Men:
Moderator edit: merged reply
01-20-2018 12:16 - last edited on 03-22-2021 05:01 by JuanJoFitbit
01-20-2018 12:16 - last edited on 03-22-2021 05:01 by JuanJoFitbit
I just bought a new Aria 2 to replace my Aria that had gone haywire and would not connect to the internet anymore. My new scale worked fine for about 2 weeks. Now it will not only properly recognize users, but it is raising my body fat almost every time I get on the scale. I have been tracking my body fat using the old Aria for years and they Aria 2 gave me similar measurements up until about a week ago when it decided that 40% of me was fat. (at one point 49%). The scale is not yet a month old. As a side note, I am also having trouble with my Fitbit charge 2 and how it calculates calories burned and keeps track of heartbeat while working out. Getting really close to moving to another vendor.
So my scale was giving me a fairly accurate at least to my knowledge body fat. Then it went nuts and couldn't recognize the difference between me and my wife. Then it started adding a couple of % to my body fat every time I got on the scale. I am currently @ something like 50% I think. I have been around technology for most of my life Charge 2 and Aria 2 are riddled with bugs and design issues. They can give you all the tips they want, but its all made up stuff and they are just dancing around the May pole. My Aria and my charge worked together just fine for a long time then they scale went haywire and would not connect to my network, so I got the new scale. It has not worked properly since day one. They have problems and that's a fact. It isn't user error and by the way, you shouldn't have to play games with settings to make it work.
Moderator edit: merged reply
01-23-2018 13:34
01-23-2018 13:34
01-24-2018 00:51
01-24-2018 00:51
Just a comment on Antopod "big boned"
I dont think that sets the scale off.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/03/are-you-big-boned-truth_n_6075706.html
01-27-2018 12:29
01-27-2018 12:29
I am having the reverse problem... my body fat % even in normal mode is showing as 13.5% and I am a female. My other scale shows 18.5%. There is absolutely no explanation, I have reset it by taking out hte batteries, tried setting it on its side between measurements so it re-calibrates... switched the lean mode on and off. So seems this scale is just extremely inaccurate. I am def. a fit person, but 13.5% is extremely low, and my BMI is 20 hah. Doesn't seem like there is a fix for this, so seems like I too wll have to return it. It also seems to lack a lot of stats I was expecting to see like lean mass. My other scale does bone mass, muscle mass, water %, and body fat. I guess I should have been happy with what I have in the first place, I just thought perhaps Fitbit would be an upgrade/more accurate.