03-24-2016 23:21
03-24-2016 23:21
03-25-2016 00:08
03-25-2016 00:08
That doesn't make sense the Blaze is looking at arm motions, not your leg motions. A natural arm swing should be fine. Try a restart of your tracker.
03-25-2016 18:07
03-25-2016 18:07
I have found the Blaze to be wildly (and inconsistently) inaccurate. I am awaiting a second replacement from Fitbit, but the first two have shorted me anywhere between 10% and 30% of my steps on any given day.
03-25-2016 18:11
03-25-2016 18:11
03-25-2016 18:20
03-25-2016 18:20
I'm comparing it to the Charge HR that I replaced with the Blaze, and yes, I have done multiple (20 or more) 100 step tests, as well as traversing a known path multiple times with both devices. For example: The two mile walk I take every morning consistently yielded between 4000 and 4200 steps with my Charge HR. My husband, on the same walk, consistenly gets around 4000 steps on that same walk. However, the Blaze has, on the same exact walk, never gotten over 3,800, and has gotten as low as 2700.
03-25-2016 18:30
03-25-2016 18:30
Yes. Blaze count less steps. I compared it with my Charge which is 99% accurate. Fitbit sent me a replacement Blaze, which is also counting 20% to 30% steps less and more less at times. When I did a 100 steps accuracy test, it counted only 58 steps which is on a straight side walk. I am on communication with support. I will respond here if it helps.
03-25-2016 18:33
03-25-2016 18:33
@chacks wrote:Yes. Blaze count less steps. I compared it with my Charge which is 99% accurate. Fitbit sent me a replacement Blaze, which is also counting 20% to 30% steps less and more less at times. When I did a 100 steps accuracy test, it counted only 58 steps which is on a straight side walk. I am on communication with support. I will respond here if it helps.
They should send you a replacement. They sent me a replacement, but it was even worse than my original one (it counted only between 26 and 71 steps in over a dozen 100 step tests), so they are sending yet another one. This will be the last shot for Blaze...if this one isn't at least 90% accurate 90% of the time, it's going back and the Charge HR is coming back into action.
03-25-2016 18:37
03-25-2016 18:37
03-25-2016 18:39
03-25-2016 18:39
03-26-2016 03:17
03-26-2016 03:17
I'm intrigued as to why you'd expect a replacement d vice with exactly the same software and hardware implementation to give you different results?
Mike | London, UK
Blaze, Surge, Charge 2, Charge, Flex 2 - iPad Air 2, Nokia Lumia 925 (Deceased), iPhone 6
Take a look at the Fitbit help site for further assistance and information.
03-26-2016 04:56
03-26-2016 04:56
03-26-2016 07:29
03-26-2016 07:29
I am finding the same thing my steps are not accurate it waited over 4 mins to count when i went on a walk for over 3 miles. The stairs are a big issue for me also. it sparatically counts them when it wants it seems. this is very frustrating!
03-26-2016 07:37
03-26-2016 07:37
03-30-2016 15:58
03-30-2016 15:58
Well, third Blaze and in a series of 100 step tests, I've got 82, 104, 65, 56, 63, 55 and 93. Just for yuks I did a 400 step test and got 250. Chances that I got three duds are pretty slim. I'm done. This thing is going back (along with the two replacements).
03-30-2016 17:09
03-30-2016 17:09
04-25-2016 15:05
04-25-2016 15:05
04-25-2016 17:38
04-25-2016 17:38
Mine still doesn't work either. Just did another test tonight - walked 3 miles, my Blaze said I only walked 2.29 miles through Connected GPS and only gave me 3,423 steps!! WHA? Obviously this product has some HUGE issues that should have been worked out before they put it in the market - if it were fine, I can't imagine all of us would be having such issues with the basic function, step counting. Funny enough, it tracked my bike ride last night just fine. The Blaze has so many functions I like, I hate to return it so do I roll the dice and hope they come out with some sort of fix? I think first, we have to get them to admit there is a problem. Hopefully, with more posts like this, they will!