08-29-2017 07:22
08-29-2017 07:22
I'm sure the Ionic will be fine for some folks, but many of us small-wristed women have been waiting for a smaller faced Blaze for a long time now. It would have been nice if Ionic came in a smaller sized face along with this first iteration. I will not be upgrading from my Charge2.
12-08-2018 18:36
12-08-2018 18:36
Hi, I see you reply to a post about Ionic but you seem to have owned a Versa too. Could you please tell me if you found a difference between the 2 regarding calorie count for the day? The Versa seems to put me 200-300 calories above my burn for the day. Have tested agains a Samsung Gear Sport and a Microsoft Band. I love the Versa (had it for 3 days)and want to keep it but then I also need an accurate calorie count. Willing to try the Ionic hence my question. I also have 5.70 inch /14.5 cm small wrists. Hope you can offer some insight:)
Thank you.
12-08-2018 18:50
12-08-2018 18:50
12-08-2018 19:57
12-08-2018 19:57
I cannot attest to calorie burn counts as I haven’t paid that close of attention to mine and compared on devices. Out of all the FitBit watches I’ve owned, I personally like the Versa best due to the size, look and features. It’s great to wear in professional environments as well as in workouts. I’ve owned the HR, HR2, Blaze, And Versa. I wanted to buy the Ionic but since it was similar to the Blaze in size, I opted to wait. Glad I did because the Versa is the one I like the best. Good luck!