02-25-2015 11:31 - edited 02-25-2015 11:33
02-25-2015 11:31 - edited 02-25-2015 11:33
I am thinking my fitbit Flex is not working right
I'm 4'11 high
31 years old femile.
128lbs.
I work out minimum 4-5 days a week and counting my calories what i eat. I'm eatim 1000-1200cal per day and burning about 1900-2300cal a day and having about 12000steps a day but.... i gained 2 punds. I am super angry and unhappy.
I would like to see with my fitbit how many calories i'm burning a day with my movments and workouts. Fitbit shows me 2000cal budned, I dont think it is right thow. I'm soo confused and angry. its has been 2 weeks since i'm wearing my fitbit and still thinking to return it
Answered! Go to the Best Answer.
02-27-2015 22:06
02-27-2015 22:06
@Nina_Honey wrote:Thsnk you guys.
Yes I choose to lose 2lbs a day cause if I eat 1300-1500calories a day then i dont lose wight at all. As you already know, when you are trying to lose 2-3lbs is harder then when you want to lose 30-50lbs. I have stuborn fat left 😞
You should be very scared by that reality.
You can't lose if you eat 1300-1500 with whatever level of daily activity and exercise you do.
What happens if you get sick or vacation and can't do that level of activity - how low must you eat then to maintain?
That means maintenance is down around that level too then, you do NOT therefore have a 1000 cal deficit from what you burn. You don't burn as much as you think. If you truly had a 1000 cal deficit, guess how much you would lose weekly? Ya, 2 lbs, and this would be over with.
Stubborn fat or not doesn't matter, you create a reasonable deficit, the fat will go.
You create too big a deficit, your body will just adapt, get stressed, slow down, ect.
The reason the last 3-5 is harder is because most people have abused their bodies trying to lose the 30-50 lbs, and the normal math doesn't work anymore on the last 3-5.
You might want to try allowing your body to recovery and unstress, and then take a reasonable deficit.
Shoot, by then, with good workouts actually giving the body a chance to improve, you may discover the last 3-5 doesn't matter when clothes fit better.
If you want to know how to allow your body to recover, let me know.
02-25-2015 16:41
02-25-2015 16:41
I wouldnt necessarily blame fitbit.
First, 1000 cals seems really low. I would consider reading about BMR and eating based off that http://www.younglifenorthdekalb.com/fitness/bmr_meal_calculator.php
Eating too little can be detrimental to weight loss and lean muscle mass.
Secondly, *what* are you eating? Are you drinking enough water?
Are you accurately logging calories? Or just eyeballing it? MyFitnessPal or LoseIt are great companion apps to Fitbit that will help you keep better track.
Finally, if you have just started exercising, you may have some watr retention as your muscles repair, thus contributing to what looks like a weight gain.
02-25-2015 17:51
02-25-2015 17:51
I use loseit about 2 years.
I do low carb diet, trying to eat mostly vegetable and proteins and snaks raw nuts + fruits. yes i drink water and i have been watching my wait all my life. I dont bale fitbit weith gain, i just don't think it shows me rights. i don't want to see how many calories my body burs just breathing and being alive, I would like to see how many calories was burn with my exceses class, work outs, walks and steps.
loseit shows me my daily calories should be 900-1000 as i'm traying to lose waight.
02-25-2015 22:55 - edited 02-25-2015 22:59
02-25-2015 22:55 - edited 02-25-2015 22:59
@Nina_Honey wrote:I use loseit about 2 years.
I do low carb diet, trying to eat mostly vegetable and proteins and snaks raw nuts + fruits. yes i drink water and i have been watching my wait all my life. I dont bale fitbit weith gain, i just don't think it shows me rights. i don't want to see how many calories my body burs just breathing and being alive, I would like to see how many calories was burn with my exceses class, work outs, walks and steps.
loseit shows me my daily calories should be 900-1000 as i'm traying to lose waight.
Do you understand WHY it's giving you 900-1000 though?
I'm betting it was your choice to select it appears a 1000 calorie deficit for 2 lbs weekly.
That doesn't appear reasonable with what you have left to lose. With about 20 to lose, should be 1 lb weekly, last 10 should be 1/2 lb weekly.
Be unreasonable with diet, it stresses your body out.
Stressed body is elevated cortisol.
Elevated cortisol can cause retaining up to 20 lbs of water.
You think angry and stressed out now about weight gain, wait until your stress actually causes it!
And a stressed body like that is also losing muscle mass as part of any weight loss.
Shoot, you may be retaining water, and losing fat and muscle still.
But the muscle ain't good, especially as short person, you'll want that later big time.
Eating half of what the body wants (and it wants to maintain) isn't going to make this easy for you.
02-25-2015 22:58
02-25-2015 22:58
@Nina_Honey wrote:I use loseit about 2 years.
I do low carb diet, trying to eat mostly vegetable and proteins and snaks raw nuts + fruits. yes i drink water and i have been watching my wait all my life. I dont bale fitbit weith gain, i just don't think it shows me rights. i don't want to see how many calories my body burs just breathing and being alive, I would like to see how many calories was burn with my exceses class, work outs, walks and steps.
loseit shows me my daily calories should be 900-1000 as i'm traying to lose waight.
Why wouldn't you want to know how much you burn in total?
All you need to do is eat less than you burn daily to lose weight.
Make it big and include muscle, make it smaller and just fat hopefully.
And you can't separate all that, unless you feel like going and getting an RMR test done, then you can subtract that RMR from the Fitbit daily burn to see what you burned extra.
02-26-2015 08:30
02-26-2015 08:30
Thsnk you guys.
Yes I choose to lose 2lbs a day cause if I eat 1300-1500calories a day then i dont lose wight at all. As you already know, when you are trying to lose 2-3lbs is harder then when you want to lose 30-50lbs. I have stuborn fat left 😞
02-27-2015 22:06
02-27-2015 22:06
@Nina_Honey wrote:Thsnk you guys.
Yes I choose to lose 2lbs a day cause if I eat 1300-1500calories a day then i dont lose wight at all. As you already know, when you are trying to lose 2-3lbs is harder then when you want to lose 30-50lbs. I have stuborn fat left 😞
You should be very scared by that reality.
You can't lose if you eat 1300-1500 with whatever level of daily activity and exercise you do.
What happens if you get sick or vacation and can't do that level of activity - how low must you eat then to maintain?
That means maintenance is down around that level too then, you do NOT therefore have a 1000 cal deficit from what you burn. You don't burn as much as you think. If you truly had a 1000 cal deficit, guess how much you would lose weekly? Ya, 2 lbs, and this would be over with.
Stubborn fat or not doesn't matter, you create a reasonable deficit, the fat will go.
You create too big a deficit, your body will just adapt, get stressed, slow down, ect.
The reason the last 3-5 is harder is because most people have abused their bodies trying to lose the 30-50 lbs, and the normal math doesn't work anymore on the last 3-5.
You might want to try allowing your body to recovery and unstress, and then take a reasonable deficit.
Shoot, by then, with good workouts actually giving the body a chance to improve, you may discover the last 3-5 doesn't matter when clothes fit better.
If you want to know how to allow your body to recover, let me know.
02-28-2015 20:42
02-28-2015 20:42
Please, how i can recover my body ?
I had meeting with personal trainer yesterday and he told me the same, my weight can be higher but i might get muscles gained.
He just recomended me to eat 5 times a day little porsions and even my daily calories will be higher then 1000cal a day i can lose weight just having right food, fat burners such avocado, graipfruit, almonds.
I am upset that, i'm trying soo hard and my weight is .... the same. all I want to lose is maximum 5 punds.
02-28-2015 23:01
02-28-2015 23:01
@Nina_Honey wrote:Please, how i can recover my body ?
I had meeting with personal trainer yesterday and he told me the same, my weight can be higher but i might get muscles gained.
He just recomended me to eat 5 times a day little porsions and even my daily calories will be higher then 1000cal a day i can lose weight just having right food, fat burners such avocado, graipfruit, almonds.
I am upset that, i'm trying soo hard and my weight is .... the same. all I want to lose is maximum 5 punds.
Just so you have a sense of what you are up against.
This is what is going to happen to the vast majority for the 30-50 lbs, it can take about 3 months to hit what they are talking about, so it doesn't happen super fast.
Now, I'm not sure if you mentioned that weight range because that's where you started, or you really have had only 5-10 lbs to lose ever. In which case this doesn't apply.
What also happens if that is going on though, is loss of muscle mass, which they comment on, when they say accounting for change in body composition. Normally those dieting lose 20% of the weight as LBM, which includes some muscle mass.
Now, in their comments, they said it appears to always remain, but further studies have shown it can recover.
Takes longer eating at suppressed maintenance, goes faster if you slowly increase calories to what it appears your body could support.
So like for a week or two at a time, you eat 100 calories more daily than you were in the diet with no weight change.
So even though it would appear you were eating at maintenance, you might call it suppressed maintenance - it's lower than it could be, by the body being stressed and hormones out of whack.
And the way to unstress body and get things back to normal, is eat at potential maintenance finally.
That can be a bit sketchy if you lost muscle mass though. Fitbit should be doing decent enough job of showing your potential maintenance, though it's actually underestimating. But it's also assuming normal amount of muscle mass for your weight. If you lost some in previous diet attempts, it's maybe right on.
That's what you'd want to work your way up to slowly, 100 calories extra daily, about 1 week at a time.
Resistance training would be best during this time too.
So each week, even if your body did not speed up and you really were eating 100 over maintenance the entire week before it sped up - it would take you 35 days to slowly gain 1 lb.
Reread that.
So that means if you gain more than 1 lb faster, it was water weight.
Going into a diet, first thing body does is stop storing as much glycogen in muscles, that stores with water. That's the first big weight drop everyone gets starting a diet.
So if you gain fast weight, it's water from that usually, which just proves prior eating level was not potential maintenance, or those stores would have already been topped off.
But good news - your body managing those water stores increases your metabolism right then, that's a part of LBM.
As to frequency of eating, totally based on personal preference. Studies have shown no benefit to weight loss by itself by meal timing or frequency.
If you have a smaller eating goal anyway because of being shorter, you may prefer to skip breakfast and eat lunch as first meal. That leaves more for dinner to be a realistic size.
In fact for many people, eating frequently just increases insulin, drops blood sugar too much, making you feel hungry when you really aren't. But a few well balanced meals with protein and fat eaten before carbs prevents that, and allows going further, besides having a bigger meal instead of maybe feeling like a bird eating seed.
Fat burning foods really is a misnomer, some foods take tad more energy to process, not that it's using fat for that though. But grapefruit is high in carbs and with increased insulin will actually shut off fat burning during that time, though it's not as bad as other fruits and their reaction. Like the comment that cold water can increase metabolism by 30%. Uh, for 20 min maybe. So instead of burning 20 calories at rest, you burned 28 during that time. Getting up to get the water actually caused burning more. At a certain point these little minors things don't outweigh (ha!) the low hanging fruit. Which as heavy as grapefruit is, probably is low hanging.
And almonds and avocado are such high fat, still good fats and needed, you can't really get too much of it on a low calorie diet, and yours is going to be lower than others.
And stress, from the weight loss attempt, from too much exercise, from life, from potential food sensitivies, from too big a diet, all increase cortisol, which constantly evelated can cause retaining up to 20 lbs of water, perhaps less on a small frame though.
So you destressing too could actually help.
It's incredible how many people will do a 2 week 250 test and actually lose weight with big water whoosh, from body getting destressed.
That's eating 250 more for 2 weeks, which should only cause a slow 1 lb gain if over maintenance.
But I think you should go for the 100 extra instead, slower jumps.
And indeed, as you eat more, your recovery from good workouts is better, allowing you to actually have a good workout. And if progressive overload lifting, you may indeed gain some muscle eating at maintenance, if current muscles are tapped out. But that is minor, like 1 lb in 6-8 weeks for a woman eating at maintenance, so don't expect much.
You can always lose fat faster than you can gain muscle, but you'll gain water weight from other improvements.
So, ready for 2 weeks eating 100 more daily, working your way up to Fitbit suggested maintenance?
Make sure you correct the Fitbit data too with manually logging non-step workouts, like lifting and biking, ect.
02-28-2015 23:08
02-28-2015 23:08
I meant to mention, there are over 200 people I know of currently using the spreadsheet mentioned on my profile page and successfully losing weight, if using it right, just fat. I know there are more, they'll pop up from time to time thanking me.
About 20 have reached goal. Others have slowed weight loss down because they enjoy the performance gains more than the fat loss, or I'm guessing there would be more.
The method I layed out for you is similar to what the spreadsheet recommends, which was really made before the Fitbit type activity trackers started becoming so widespread, and you had to figure things out a little more manually.
And this isn't even my originality, the idea of reasonable weight loss for amount to lose and types of workouts is nothing new, the studies I used in there for eating recommendations are newer, and calculating daily burn are newer, but same ideas.
It's like the anti-fad diet, it's always there in the background, but never catches attention because it's not fast, doesn't seem extreme or painful, so makes people think it can't work.