Cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

New and Need Help Understand My Weekly Report

ANSWERED

Hello All,

 

I have a question, I do not understand this summary in my weekly reports. Here is the screen shot of it. Is this saying that I came in 2908 of the goal I set. This is the only thing I can figure. I am suppose to be 500 under a day, so x7 days is 3500. Add that to the 2908 and I have the different between burned and in. So if I do understand this, then I ate 2000 less calories than I need to, is this right?

 

CALORIES IN VS OUT
-2908
WEEKLY TOTAL
20591 cals burned
14183 cals eaten
-3500 plan deficit
 
Best Answer
0 Votes
1 BEST ANSWER

Accepted Solutions

You burned 20591 during the week.

 

You ate 14183.

 

You created a deficit of 20591 - 14183 = 6408 (915 daily avg).

 

You wanted a deficit of 3500.

 

You ate 6408 - 3500 = 2908 less than you intended to.

Or in their speak, you were -2908 under goal.

 

So if 1 lb weekly was reasonable - you made the deficit unreasonable.

 

Eat up! You must have worked hard for it, why waste your workouts by not feeding them well and getting max recovery and repair?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help the next searcher of answers, mark a reply as Solved if it was, or a thumbs up if it was a good idea too.

View best answer in original post

Best Answer
4 REPLIES 4

You burned 20591 during the week.

 

You ate 14183.

 

You created a deficit of 20591 - 14183 = 6408 (915 daily avg).

 

You wanted a deficit of 3500.

 

You ate 6408 - 3500 = 2908 less than you intended to.

Or in their speak, you were -2908 under goal.

 

So if 1 lb weekly was reasonable - you made the deficit unreasonable.

 

Eat up! You must have worked hard for it, why waste your workouts by not feeding them well and getting max recovery and repair?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help the next searcher of answers, mark a reply as Solved if it was, or a thumbs up if it was a good idea too.
Best Answer

@Heybales - Question - I always end up with negative calories too. So having negative calories isn't good?

_____________________________________

Started with a Flex. Now have ChargeHR.
Contact Customer Support

Best Answer
0 Votes

@yldthng wrote:

@Heybales - Question - I always end up with negative calories too. So having negative calories isn't good?


If your set deficit is reasonable, and you are making it bigger and unreasonable - no, not good.

 

If set deficit is even slower than needed just because, and you make it bigger on some days - not so bad.

 

If you think bigger deficit is better, why not stop eating and get it over with faster?

 

What do you think would go wrong with that?

 

Whatever you think of, there is likely more reasons you aren't aware of, and they still happen, and depending on deficit, faster or slower.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help the next searcher of answers, mark a reply as Solved if it was, or a thumbs up if it was a good idea too.
Best Answer
0 Votes

Is it possible to download a report of meals by week or a selected range of dates, rather than just one day at a time?  I expect it is, but can't figure it out easily via the site.  Thanks!

Best Answer
0 Votes