09-11-2021 10:17
09-11-2021 10:17
Elevation gain on hikes or floor counts is completely overstated and inaccurate. I noticed it broke in one of the previous software updates. I have noticed others having similar issues on similar devices.
Is this community only a way for customers to vent? or is there actual Fitbit product teams monitoring and able to provide answers? These are expensive devices and we expect expensive devices to perform more accurately. Further more, we are paying a premium services for metrics, expect metrics to be accurate. Anyone?
09-13-2021 19:22
09-13-2021 19:22
09-13-2021 19:29 - edited 09-13-2021 19:30
09-13-2021 19:29 - edited 09-13-2021 19:30
I'm not sure what you wanna say @Rich_Laue
EDIT: oops just saw a similar reply by @scottscannon so it seems we are in two with some problem of understanding
09-13-2021 20:07 - edited 09-13-2021 20:28
09-13-2021 20:07 - edited 09-13-2021 20:28
I believe @scottscannon and @Giampi71 hit the spot.
Besides, "No data is better than bad data".
Everyone who worked in scientific or technological fields knows that bad data is good as a first step towards getting good data.
If you just accept bad data as the final data, than probably you will end up with wrong conclusions and/or bad solutions. When dealing with health related parameters, this can be dangerous. Fortunately, most Sense users are usually knowledgeable enough to spot at least some of the errors, like Floors.
That's why I understand and accept that Fitbit still doesn't provide, e.g., instant SpO2 or HRV readings. I'm sure they have them. Why, then, don't they do as with Floors and just release them? I believe they know those would generally be bad data, which could lead users to dangerously wrong conclusions (sometimes, data can have much background noise and only averaging a lot of them - apparently several hours, in Sense's case - it is possible to extract good and useful information - this is basic digital signal processing).