10-12-2020
20:12
- last edited on
09-22-2021
18:12
by
SilviaFitbit
10-12-2020
20:12
- last edited on
09-22-2021
18:12
by
SilviaFitbit
Hey
is anyone else experiencing huge heart rate inaccuracy during exercise with the sense?
During exercise with the sense it won’t ever get above 120bpm for me
but if I use my charge 4 during the EXACT same exercise my heart rate is between 145-170bpm in the cardio zone
It’s extremely disappointing and I don’t want to have to switch to my charge 4 everytime I exercise to ensure accurate heart rate
defeats the purpose of having the sense
seriously one of the most frustrating experiences I have ever had.
Moderator Edit: Clarified subject
Answered! Go to the Best Answer.
12-02-2021 09:02
12-02-2021 09:02
Since heart rate monitor is inaccurate, has there been any discussion about accuracy of other metrics, e.g. hrs slept, deep vs REM, breathing rate? I guess I’ll need to do my research there also. If they can’t get something as straightforward as heart rate, I’m starting to wonder about everything else I trend. Aria and weight seem pretty accurate (gained 2 lbs over thanksgiving!!)
12-02-2021 12:06
12-02-2021 12:06
@MrMogo wrote:Since heart rate monitor is inaccurate, has there been any discussion about accuracy of other metrics, e.g. hrs slept, deep vs REM, breathing rate? I guess I’ll need to do my research there also. If they can’t get something as straightforward as heart rate, I’m starting to wonder about everything else I trend. Aria and weight seem pretty accurate (gained 2 lbs over thanksgiving!!)
Best view this chaps videos
12-03-2021 10:41
12-03-2021 10:41
Just had a nice chat with FitBit. They say: We’re aware of it and are working to identify a resolution as quickly as possible.
Chat Transcript below:
12-03-2021 14:57
12-03-2021 14:57
Dang. I got the Sense for my BF after watching videos that showed that the heart rate had gradually improved over the past year, with October being the last time the guy (Quantitative Scientist, I think). I'd hoped that the watch would be worth it if it really WAS being improved.
Maybe I should just send it back unopened and wait for Samsung watches to hit their stride... Any thoughts?
12-04-2021 10:03
12-04-2021 10:03
I've had my sense for two weeks, first fitbit, wife and kids have had them for a few years (versa 3 and charge??).
This happened to me for the second time today, same issue. I set activity to bike (GPS takes 1+ minute to connect standing in the middle of my driveway). When I set the activity, my HR is 90... 92. I get on the bike and sprint for 30 seconds then assume my normal pace for 2 or 3 minutes. I do not feel the vibration indicating heart rate zone change. Because this happened a few days ago, I stopped the bike, checked HR in the activity (swipe screen) and my HR is 88. No way. I stop the activity and my normal clock face tells me my HR is 138 (50 BPM higher than it was 15 seconds ago).
Today I restarted the activity (bike) and it immediately recognized I was in the cardio zone (132 for me). Interestingly, the GPS connected within a few minutes. My question is, why does the activity drop my HR some, but not all, of the time????
My other peeves (so far) I am hoping someone can help me out with:
1. GPS takes at least a minute, sometimes 3 to connect and I must be outside. My wife and daughter's connects in a few seconds indoors or out.
2. Despite saving the pswd, my wifi does not remember it. If I want to connect to wifi the network SysID is showing, but I must put the password in every time (not a big deal as I don't need wifi that often, yet).
3. The activity screen in the Android phone app. When I view an activity summary (today screen) it will show I biked for 10 miles in 50 minutes at an average speed of 5.6 miles (wrong) but if I open the details is correct (rate = distance/rate, so this should be easy... got the time, got the distance....
I am still in my return window and I'm wondering if I got a dud. I haven't used all the functionality but if I am incorrectly losing 100+ 'zone minutes' per week (and this week it was over that and would have been double if I didn't restart the biking activity), what is the point. That is really what I want to track. Again, other family members do not have this issue with their older watches.
Thanks,
mattie
12-04-2021 10:31
12-04-2021 10:31
Hi @SunsetRunner Sense has newer Heart rate technology. If you scroll down the page, there is a very large thread about Sense heart rate.
12-04-2021 10:33
12-04-2021 10:33
Unfortunately, the improvement didn't happen. I have been a Fitbit user since 2014 and I have cycled through the Flex, Blaze, Surge, Aria, Aria Air, Ionic and for the last year, the Sense. I have a giant spreadsheet tracking everything I can control and the Active Zone minutes have greatly diminished since I switched to the Sense.
I read the hints and tips, but I can honestly say that has been the only element that has changed in the mix of the numbers. The band changed on my Ionic to a magnetic band, thanks to the loss of my right arm in 2019. When I changed to the Sense, I found the same magnetic band for the Sense and have continued with my exercise. Sadly, as much as I would like to say the Sense is a great piece of equipment, I'm very tempted to go backwards to my Ionic, which has a poor battery life after three and a half years of usage. If there is a chance, I might try and go find a brand new Ionic, since I know it is a very good piece of equipment.
12-04-2021 11:12
12-04-2021 11:12
I read that. But, because my clock face shows the correct HR (but I can't view the activity and the clock face back to back, must restart activity) I think it is inherent to the app (software) and not the device (hardware)... Case in point, when I restarted today I did nothing to the watch, I did not move it on my wrist, tighten the band etc. as was pointed out in the other thread. Stopped, checked clock face (correct HR), restarted and the HR corrected.
I also wish I could put in specs for my bike as can be done in Strava... I am riding a 34 lb MTB with 2.5" knobbies where I average 12-13 mph. The calorie count on fitbit is as if I was riding my road bike (16 lbs .5" smooth road tires). The calorie count difference between Strava and Fitbit is substantial... 25-35%. Strava is inline with what I have researched/calculated on other sites... Strava appears to be accurate and fitbit is very far off.
12-04-2021 11:37
12-04-2021 11:37
@SunsetRunner If it was software, would think Fitbit could have figured something out in a year? Hope you're right, but nothing seems to be happening about fixing it.
12-04-2021 14:13
12-04-2021 14:13
I've been a software developer for 30+ years and the fact that the clock face has it correct and the app does not... but then does.... my $ is on software.
I was hoping other's were experiencing the same thing and perhaps a moderator would take a gander. I've had the thing two weeks so I would assume it was not loaded with the latest patch/update, but I do not seem to have an update. The app can run in background (Android).
12-04-2021 14:16
12-04-2021 14:16
Also, if it is software, I would not be the only one having this problem... unless it was my software (which, an update would correct). Stopping during a ride to adjust your data acquisition defeats the purpose (unless there is a really hot chick and somehow I manage to start a conversation. But that doesn't happen to me).
12-04-2021 14:54
12-04-2021 14:54
I have the same issue, the Alta HR recorded active minutes (prefer) . Where the Sense only has Active Zone Minutes (rubbish) . If I knew this was the case, I wouldn't have bothered getting a new Fitbit. Very disappointed, please improve app for Sense and add the Active feature.
12-04-2021 17:47
12-04-2021 17:47
That was a good video. I'd like to think there is some accuracy to Fitbit; not exact, but not necessarily that bad. I wanted to say this about the heart rate. I remember reading somewhere else that motion could affect the accuracy and that seems to be the case. When doing ellipticals, I found out the Sense wasn't that bad at recording heart rate if I kept my hands glued to something on the machine that wasn't working. Of course, this won't be the case for active exercise like a Hit class, or jogging, etc. Sense just doesn't seem to take good heart rate reading if your wrist is moving around. But I guess I'll live with it for another year just for the nice apps and dashboard.
12-04-2021 19:49
12-04-2021 19:49
FYI - bought the Sense a week ago, its heart rate seems accurate enough to me ... 60-70 at rest, 110 during the brisk walk, 160 during the run outdoors, 150 during on the treadmill run.
12-05-2021 05:05
12-05-2021 05:05
OK I will give it a try, I guess I got use to my old Fitbit Alta HR, that logged my active minutes and fat burn calories throughout the day. Where as the Sense only has Active Zone Minutes, it would be good to have the option to see Active Minutes as well. Maybe something Fitbit could improve on.
12-05-2021 08:09
12-05-2021 08:09
@UnguruBulan , did you Sense update to the current version of the firmware/OS when you were setting it up? Mine did and my heart rate has been accurate for the two weeks I've been using it. It was even reasonably accurate in the pool - tightening the band so the watch is pressed hard against your skin and then don't use the swim exercise will result in heartrate monitoring while swimming.
12-05-2021 08:51
12-05-2021 08:51
@obermd yes I remember the device did spend sometime on that software update, during the setup process.
The version I can see it has now is 44.128.6.12
When I say the heart rate reading is "accurate enough" I meant it's not always perfect, but not crazily off either, like on other members' reports here.
For instance, I noticed the other night, at a complete rest (in bed, just before sleep) it read 5-7 bpm higher than the reality (pulse being manually checked, using with a stopwatch).
Whereas at this very moment (noon time, while I resting on a chair) it read precisely the same value that I manually checked with the stopwatch.
It would probably be more difficult for me to do similar comparisons while exercising.
12-05-2021 09:52
12-05-2021 09:52
So now we have two people reporting the same thing on the current version of the FitBit OS. I don't expect any wrist tracker to be 100% accurate, but I have seen consistency with my wife's Charge 4 and my Sense is consistent with her Charge 4, which I wore as a test prior to getting my Sense.
For those who want 100% pulse accuracy I suggest you use the chest strap solution with a wrist worn receiver. This is the solution used by medical professionals to get an accurate heart beat reading during medical stress testing.
12-05-2021 16:22
12-05-2021 16:22
@obermd, you are lucky that your Sense is fairly accurate. Mine is consistently inconsistent. I have worn a Polar chest strap at the same time, and one time my Sense is all over the place, the next it is close, but NEVER gets as high as the Polar. I don't expect the HR to be perfect, but it doesn't even come close. My HR can be 90+ while sitting and the same when I am exercising intensely. Today while my Sense was off my arm, it was registering a HR of 92. I am frustrated that Fitbit keeps saying that they are aware of the problem and working on it. That has been the response for over a year. We never hear when there will be a resolution and they continue to sell the Sense.
12-05-2021 16:41
12-05-2021 16:41
@Tgisele I'm fairly new to Fitbit, never had a tracking device (other than apps on my smartphone) before this Fitbit Sense, but didn't take me too long to realize their customer support and their replies to people's frustrations here is quite immature, to say the least. It's maybe time for you to return / replace your Sense device.
What else's annoying me is their business model where lots of the device's capability can only be unleashed if you buy their Premium subscription on their app.
Also that without the app it's impossible to setup Sense.
Those kind if things make me regret a little bit for going with Fitbit, I was almost buying myself a Garmin before giving Fitbit a try.