From what I have read, neither is compatible with ECG. You must remove the watch from the case. I can’t see much of an inconvenience though. Just remove it to utilize that function.
I kinda like the Spigen. It has a more dress feel to it. The supcase is a little too squared off for my tastes.
Can you let us know what you decide on and possibly review? I’d appreciate it. I also saw one from Gelishi
Best AnswerOk Good luck with the hunt.
Best AnswerWent ahead and bought Spigen to try.
As I mentioned before I used the clear NANW TPU cover. I really had no issues with it except it trapped moisture between cover and the watch screen.
It would also yellow over time. It did the job of protecting the screen though. Not a scratch since new in November 2020.
The Spigen is very rugged. It is 1 piece band and cover. Watch face is exposed. It does protect the 4 corners of the face which have been reported to be a break point when dropped. I assume the face could break if hit straight on. With the 4 corners not exposed the EDA/ECG features won’t work. I never use them so not a deal breaker for me.
The material reminds me of my otter box for my iPhone. Band is stiff but will most likely soften over time. I suspect I will have dust collect around the watch face where it meets the cover, which is no different than my otter box protector. Charges without removal from case.
Best AnswerI got the Spigen as well. Its quite OK looking and seems to protect it well. But it's impressively stiff and that haven't changed a bit since purchase. But I like the protection, so I'm keeping it on for now.
That’s for the info. How long have you had it?
Any moisture issues? I’ll trade off the stiffness and looks for protection at this point.
Best Answer