01-04-2016 05:23
01-04-2016 05:23
Answered! Go to the Best Answer.
01-04-2016 05:37
01-04-2016 05:37
That be 'ly @l3ryn
Feel free to add your vote / comment to @Bombdigidy 's suggestion on the Feature Requests subforum:
URL: Customizable Clock Display, and Addition of a Second Hand
The more votes increases the chance of the function becoming available.
01-04-2016 05:37
01-04-2016 05:37
That be 'ly @l3ryn
Feel free to add your vote / comment to @Bombdigidy 's suggestion on the Feature Requests subforum:
URL: Customizable Clock Display, and Addition of a Second Hand
The more votes increases the chance of the function becoming available.
01-04-2016 05:52
01-04-2016 05:52
01-04-2016 06:21
01-04-2016 11:12 - edited 01-04-2016 11:29
01-04-2016 11:12 - edited 01-04-2016 11:29
I have no connection to FitBit, but as someone with a bunch of years in software for apps and embedded devices (I won't say how many years) I would advise you not to hold your breath waiting for this feature.
The display used in the Surge is of a type that has very low power consumption when displaying static data, but uses much more power to update what is displayed. As such, adding a second hand to the watch face will radically increase the power the watch face uses, and very noticably impact battery life. My guess - and it is just a guess - is that the FitBit team won't want to deal with the complaints of reduced battery life that comes from adding the second hand. Otherwise, we would have the second hand already. I notice that none of the 4 available watch faces update frequently, with the possible exception of flare, and that does not update anywhere near as quick as each second.
I suggest you go get yourself a new watch.
01-27-2016 06:48
01-27-2016 06:48
"I suggest you go get yourself a new watch." <---unnecessarily snarky I think, for a request for a standard watch feature.
Don't expect anyone in the medical community (where smart watches have a real utility) to wear one of these devices. I'm tired of waiting for the Apple Watch to get GPS for running; I would buy a surge today if it had a second hand watch face. I know tons of folks who are docs and nurses who DO wear Apple watches and they integrate with lots of medical apps - it's useful. But primarly I want this for fitness, it just also needs to be a useful watch. Not useful without a second hand. Apple watch has one. Not optional for lots of professions and hobbies; I could count pulses or IV drip rate looking at analog seconds, but that's me keeping track of two sets of moving numbers, and increased potential for error.
If the devs for fitbit aren't interested in catering their product to users, then why would I be interested in buying one?
01-27-2016 07:35
01-27-2016 07:35
@bunnehfeet wrote:Apple watch has one.
Apple iWatch autonomy is ONE day.
Surge autonomy is more than 6 days, depending the settings.
seeing the difference ?
01-27-2016 12:53
01-27-2016 12:53
Doesn't matter how many days the charge lasts if it is useless to me as an actual watch.
01-27-2016 13:10
01-27-2016 13:10
@bunnehfeet wrote:Doesn't matter how many days the charge lasts if it is useless to me as an actual watch.
True enough. For the moment, then, I'd reconcile yourself to not being a member of the target market for Surge. I assume that it's also true that the Charge and Charge HR don't maintain the display for long enough to medically useful, even with a seconds display?
Mike | London, UK
Blaze, Surge, Charge 2, Charge, Flex 2 - iPad Air 2, Nokia Lumia 925 (Deceased), iPhone 6
Take a look at the Fitbit help site for further assistance and information.
01-27-2016 13:52
01-27-2016 13:52
@bunnehfeet wrote:Doesn't matter how many days the charge lasts if it is useless to me as an actual watch.
your advice.
not mine.
if i need a chronometer, i take a chronometer.
and i have one.
02-13-2016 18:22
02-13-2016 18:22
02-14-2016 06:02
02-14-2016 06:02
@DrCraft wrote:
We reallyyyyyyy NEED a second hand ASAP!
05-18-2016 08:52
05-18-2016 08:52
05-20-2016 00:57
05-20-2016 00:57
Mike | London, UK
Blaze, Surge, Charge 2, Charge, Flex 2 - iPad Air 2, Nokia Lumia 925 (Deceased), iPhone 6
Take a look at the Fitbit help site for further assistance and information.
05-20-2016 15:56
05-20-2016 15:56
Fitbit Surge uses the Sharp Memory LCD display for showing on screen information. The display uses very little power when the display is static as the information is stored within the LCD display and does not need to be refreshed (like clock with no second as the display needs to be refreshed once a minute). However when displaying dynamic display -- a second hand --- the energy requirement is four times high from 15 micro watt to 60 microwatt. If the second display is on all the time the power consumption would shoot from 15 micro watt to 60 microwatt. With a 150 100mAH battery, it will have a sustained charge of 1 days or less as compared to a typical 4-5 days charge cycle for current surge products.
For GPS, it is ON only on demand. If the user keeps the GPS on all the time, the battery would drain completely within 10 hours.
http://www.mouser.com/catalog/specsheets/LS013B7DH01_16_AUG_10.PDF
12-20-2016 03:32
12-20-2016 03:32
Above URL is not Available & I want to to Request the same feature of adding Second hand to Surge Clock.
12-20-2016 04:47
12-20-2016 04:47
https://community.fitbit.com/t5/Feature-Suggestions/idb-p/features
please vote in one of the hundred of requests about.
04-19-2017 10:34
04-19-2017 10:34
I saw that new faces came out for the blaze, do you know if that watch has a drastically different screen refresh system, or do you think a solution is potentially in the near future for surge as well?