Fitbit Developers oversee the SDK and API forums. We're here to answer questions about Fitbit developer tools, assist with projects, and make sure your voice is heard by the development team.
Best Answer
Fitbit Developers oversee the SDK and API forums. We're here to answer questions about Fitbit developer tools, assist with projects, and make sure your voice is heard by the development team.
It's not something that we plan on supporting, at least in the near term.
We strongly recommend that apps that act on behalf of another company register an app on dev.fitbit.com for each of their customers. Otherwise, you'll need to use a more generic redirect URI for all of your customers' customers.
Best Answer
Best Answer
Fitbit Developers oversee the SDK and API forums. We're here to answer questions about Fitbit developer tools, assist with projects, and make sure your voice is heard by the development team.
No, we don't have that ability. The OAuth 2.0 specification requires an exact match for good security reasons. (Other OAuth 2.0 providers only match on hostname, not full URI, but even in that situation, it's unreasonable to expect to match more than a couple hostnames.)
Best AnswerWe have the exact same issue. Is there a way to expand the 3,000 character limit? This only allows us access to roughly 42 different hostnames.
Best Answer
Fitbit Developers oversee the SDK and API forums. We're here to answer questions about Fitbit developer tools, assist with projects, and make sure your voice is heard by the development team.
How much bigger would you need it to be? This is really going against our intent—we don't want to match a bunch of different hostnames for a single app. It's more of a convenience for apps that have multiple environments (QA, staging, production, etc).
Best AnswerWe have over 130 different subdomains (and growing) but we found a different solution with logging in the user that is sent back through the state addition, then forwards them back to their original subdomain after completing the fitbit process. But we're not keen on sending information that could log someone in via the state method if at all possible.
Best Answer
@thidev wrote:But we're not keen on sending information that could log someone in via the state method if at all possible.
Then don't pass that information. You can put whatever value in there you'd like. It doesn't have to be the same value of your cookie session or something. You could just use the subdomain of origin and no user-specific information.
Best Answer