04-14-2016 19:13
04-14-2016 19:13
The HR issue got a bit better after a reset. But the Blaze consistently dropped my HR. But the most bizarre thing... wearing my Blaze for only 3 hours, with no flights of stairs... I've climbed a whopping 12 flights.
My Polar a360 had a crappy latch, but man that thing tracked HR etc with much more precision than this.
I'll return Blaze and wait for the Vivoactive HR from Garmin.
Thanks for the support folks
04-16-2016 14:25
04-16-2016 14:25
@StuartK1968 It's great to see you around! I'm sorry to hear about your experience with Blaze. I noticed that someone sent you the heart rate article in this post. It sounds like your Blaze had some hardware issues because it wasn't tracking floors.
In case you still have your Blaze, you may want to contact Customer Support so they can check what options they have for you.
Keep me posted .
Want to get more active? Visit Get Moving in the Lifestyle Discussion Forum.
04-17-2016 08:12
04-17-2016 08:12
Thanks for the follow-up message.
I returned the Fitbit Blaze to Best Buy with no issues (thanks BB).
Yesterday, I purchased the Microsoft Band 2. So far, the HR data is at least 20 bpm more accurate than the blaze.
04-17-2016 08:18
04-17-2016 08:18
04-17-2016 08:22
04-17-2016 08:22
04-17-2016 08:28 - edited 04-17-2016 08:28
04-17-2016 08:28 - edited 04-17-2016 08:28
" They said almost everyone either gets their money back or gets something from a different manufacturer."
Not to bemoan the point, but the Blaze - as a fitness tracker - functioned worse than my Polar a360, and current MS Band 2.
With respect to the software... it's not even close, Microsoft's Health app/online site (and I can't believe I'm typing this, as I'm a Mac guy) is incredible. It really makes Fitibit's offerings seem kind of amateurish.
04-17-2016 08:38
04-17-2016 08:38
Must be why Microsoft is number one in the market for activity trackers.
04-17-2016 08:47
04-17-2016 08:47
@StuartK1968 wrote:" They said almost everyone either gets their money back or gets something from a different manufacturer."
Not to bemoan the point, but the Blaze - as a fitness tracker - functioned worse than my Polar a360, and current MS Band 2.
With respect to the software... it's not even close, Microsoft's Health app/online site (and I can't believe I'm typing this, as I'm a Mac guy) is incredible. It really makes Fitibit's offerings seem kind of amateurish.
Best Buy has the best customer service. I always shop at BB. I return my Blaze twice, I thought my first Blaze was defective. It counts the steps everytime just moving my hand. The second one did the same thing. I had to return my Blaze and exchanging with Apple Watch because I do not like the clock face and removing the watch to charge. This is $200.00 watch, I am sure the watch will get loosed by removing it to charge too many times, very unclever design by Fitbit. I saw in this forum someone has already experienced with the problem.
04-17-2016 08:57 - edited 04-17-2016 08:58
04-17-2016 08:57 - edited 04-17-2016 08:58
#1 song right now is Work by Rihanna.
Point? Poor correlation between quality vs quantity.
If the Blaze functioned, even in the most basic of ways, I wouldn't have returned the unit. But when the Blaze claims your heart rate is 30 BPM faster than actual, and that you've climbed 14 flights of stairs when you've done no such thing, the other oft repeated issues - half baked Fit Star feature, silly charging mechanism - make a return a no brainer.
04-17-2016 08:57
04-17-2016 08:57
04-17-2016 08:59
04-17-2016 08:59
04-17-2016 09:00 - edited 04-17-2016 09:01
04-17-2016 09:00 - edited 04-17-2016 09:01
It clearly works very well for many users; I think you're being rather captious, OP.
04-17-2016 09:06
04-17-2016 09:06
04-17-2016 09:10
04-17-2016 09:10
Yup - the close to non-existant social platform is an issue. No doubt.
04-18-2016 17:28
04-18-2016 17:28
@StuartK1968 Check out my previous post about Blaze's FitStar guided workouts, here.
@MikeIT I recommend voting for this existing idea within the Feature Request board. The more votes that idea gets, the more likely it is to be considered in the future for implementation.