10-20-2014
23:01
- last edited on
03-09-2021
08:25
by
JuanJoFitbit
10-20-2014
23:01
- last edited on
03-09-2021
08:25
by
JuanJoFitbit
Who has the time to average 50,000 steps a day!? How can this be possible?
Moderator edit: updated subject for clarity
Answered! Go to the Best Answer.
09-19-2016 10:00
09-19-2016 10:00
09-19-2016 15:23
09-19-2016 15:23
I saw 180+ in quite a few runners, which are not world class. Maybe they have shorter legs :). It's interesting to know there is a metronome option you can set on some watches, to beep for a specific cadence. You can also find songs that target a specific amount of beats per minute. I imagine the 152 spm I had in a 3:38 marathon (90% running, 10% walking) is not in popular demand ....
09-19-2016 18:07 - edited 09-20-2016 07:58
09-19-2016 18:07 - edited 09-20-2016 07:58
@MihaiMVP wrote:I saw 180+ in quite a few runners, which are not world class. Maybe they have shorter legs :). It's interesting to know there is a metronome option you can set on some watches, to beep for a specific cadence. You can also find songs that target a specific amount of beats per minute. I imagine the 152 spm I had in a 3:38 marathon (90% running, 10% walking) is not in popular demand ....
Sprinters, pretty much regardless of age have a cadence well up in the 180 and higher range; that said, I've met a few folks who run distance who've had, "had" being the operative word, high cadences, however, they all had unnaturally short choppy strides, and once coached up a bit, their natural stride broke through and it was virtually always in the high 150 to mid 160 range.
Regarding my comment about world class athletes (once again, meaning "distance" athletes), that was a bit of an exaggeration, back when I was in high school in the early to mid 1970s I was a sub-4:20 miler and I too had a cadence right bang on 180 and I was far from world class. It would probably have been more accurate for me to have written something along the lines of "young competitive athletes".
As for someone running a 3:38 marathon with 90% running and 10% walking, nope, not buying; if such a person actually exists they were either horribly coached or have absolutely no clue what they're doing. Think about it; a 3:38 marathon works out to an average pace of 8:19 per mile; no self respecting 8:19 runner is going to do any walking during a marathon unless they choke on the water at a water stop or are working out a cramp on a hot day.
09-20-2016 07:52
09-20-2016 07:52
I am just trying to inform those 50-80K steppers per day what they are doing to their bodies. As a Physical Therapist I felt it was my obligation not only to treat them but to educate them on possible causes of their injuries so they could avoid further injuries if the problem was self inflicted. I would tell them they could take my advice which was backed up by my education and 38 years of experience, or not. If they choose not to listen to me it was not my, fill in the blank, that was being re-injuried, it was theirs.
09-20-2016 08:06
09-20-2016 08:06
Do you really think 50k a day is that bad on a body? That is the equivalant of being on your feet for 8-9 hours, that seems sustainable. That is a full day of work. The jump from 50-80 is quite a bit; that's a full 5 more hours on your feet. I'm not trying to badger you it just seems to me that we should be able to be on our feet for 40-50k without excess. 80k does seem to be over the line though. I think the 8 hour working day is a good measure of what we can sustain long term.
09-20-2016 08:35
09-20-2016 08:35
My Son is a department manager at menards, he is on his feet 10-11 hours a day and only logs 20K steps. If a person is on thier feet 9 hours a day they would have to average 93 steps a minute with no breaks. How productive could a person be walking 93 steps every minute for 9 hours. What kind of job could they have, no time to talk to a customer, solve problems, they couldn't operate a machine, do paper work, talk on the phone, help out a co-worker while constantly on the move. The more I read these posts the more I come to realize that it's all fantasy. Common sense tells me that 50k-80K steps per day is just a joke especially when someone suggests it's easy. I no longer care if anyone is actually doing it, because it's not my, fill in the blank, that they are slowly but surely damaging. I'm done commenting!
09-20-2016 09:50
09-20-2016 09:50
09-20-2016 11:15
09-20-2016 11:15
The question is about 50,000 steps a day, not 50,000 steps a week. The context for the concern is cheaters in the activity groups.
09-20-2016 11:43
09-20-2016 11:43
@theenglishowl wrote:
I did 100 k last week (took all week but boy was I happy at the end of the week) would have rubbed me a little the wrong way if I had read a comment from someone who said it was fake.
Hey Maureen,
Like @GershonSurge wrote, nobody is doubting or challenging folks who log 50,000 or more steps per week, the issue here is folks who claim 50,000, 80,000, or even 100,000+ steps per day, every day.
09-20-2016 12:34
09-20-2016 12:34
09-20-2016 15:20
09-20-2016 15:20
09-20-2016 15:23
09-20-2016 15:23
09-20-2016 17:55
09-20-2016 17:55
@brunoray wrote:
You're saying a WEEK not a DAY.... The first person that started this was saying 50K a DAY; very different than a WEEK. Which is it?
Speedy
To whom are you responding?
09-20-2016 19:25
09-20-2016 19:25
09-21-2016 01:09 - edited 09-21-2016 04:00
09-21-2016 01:09 - edited 09-21-2016 04:00
This "self-respect" thing is a bit macho and overrated. If you knew how great that 3:38 marathon felt :). Every 10 minutes giving my legs a rest ... sometimes people ask if you are ok, but they eventually get their answer. That was a decent time for me, 10 minutes within my personal best and second place. I had a mountain marathon the very next day and after a slow start to make sure my legs were fine, I felt ready to run another good marathon - sub 6 hr for a +2000m elevation.
PS: Run or walk, you still get the medal :D.
09-21-2016 02:37
09-21-2016 02:37
@MihaiMVP wrote:This "self-respect" thing is a bit macho and overrated. If you knew how great that 3:38 marathon felt :). Every 10 minutes giving my legs a rest ... sometimes people ask if you are ok, but they eventually get their answer. That was a decent time for me, 10 minutes within my personal best and second place. I had a mountain marathon the very next day and after a slow start to make sure my legs were fine, I felt ready to run another good marathon - sub 6 hr for a +2000m elevation.
Jeff Galloway recommends a run walk run method for people who cannot run the whole distance or who choose to make a marathon a less grueling experience. The time lost isn't as much as people think as the runner will be moving during the walking breaks.
Joe Henderson, the former chief editor of Runner's World magazine, extols the virtues of Long Slow Distance, or as he prefers to call it, comfortable running. He recommends people run for at least an hour almost every day and not worry about the pace. Running is most fun when it becomes a positive lifetime addiction.
Time to go for a long slow run. Great job @MihaiMVP!
09-21-2016 08:21
09-21-2016 08:21
theenglishowl. I think 100k a week is doable and not over doing it. But 50K steps per day is inane, that would be 250K per week and 1MILLION steps a month, utterly crazy and undoable!
09-21-2016 11:09
09-21-2016 11:09
09-21-2016 11:20
09-21-2016 11:20
09-22-2016 08:42
09-22-2016 08:42
@Emmeli - I was wondering the same thing... just wondering. Nothing more. This moring someone mentioned that she averages 35K per day. I walk so few steps that I thought maybe she meant something else. Anyway, I'm glad you asked and that some reaonable people actually answered the question with how it could be possible instead of some glib answer. 🙂