10-20-2014
23:01
- last edited on
03-09-2021
08:25
by
JuanJoFitbit
10-20-2014
23:01
- last edited on
03-09-2021
08:25
by
JuanJoFitbit
Who has the time to average 50,000 steps a day!? How can this be possible?
Moderator edit: updated subject for clarity
Answered! Go to the Best Answer.
05-08-2016 03:25
05-08-2016 03:25
05-08-2016 04:27
05-08-2016 04:27
The fact is, at race pace, the fastest distance runners in the world only have about a 180 stride per minute rate; the distance covered in one hour is somewhere around 13 miles, and the number of strides will equate to no more than 11,000 per hour.
05-08-2016 06:33
05-08-2016 06:33
05-09-2016 07:48
05-09-2016 07:48
You mentioned 48K in a work week, i see that as reasonable, bur someone who claims to log 50K steps per day would everage 350K per week and close to 2.5 millions steps per week, people Get Real!
05-09-2016 07:52
05-09-2016 07:52
No, Jerry said he could get 15-20K in the Gym in one hour and then after work walk his dog and log another 30K steps.
05-09-2016 07:58
05-09-2016 07:58
Please read James87's post on 5-6, that is exactly what he said.
05-09-2016 08:06
05-09-2016 08:06
Please accept my apology, I did miss read James's post.
05-09-2016 09:03
05-09-2016 09:03
05-09-2016 09:16
05-09-2016 09:16
@Bbeliever215 wrote:
I have only had my fitbit for less than six months and having been in a fee heavy stepper challenges, 50k isn't that big of a deal. I normally average about 30k or so a day and it isn't hard. I work out and walk everywhere. Everyone, won't have joint issues. Everyone isn't cheating. Some people just love being active in terms of cardio and that's okay. Some people also have jobs that allows them to be active. I have reached 100k in one day and it was difficult. Will I do this everyday or even every week? Heck no! But I did it because I wanted to challenge myself. There are people that are happy they can reach 10k and they should be appalled as well. We all have different activity level and goals. That is all.
Hmmm, 30,000 steps per day is quite doable, even for folks with families and full time jobs, but 50,000 steps? No, not buying. On a day-to-day basis, such individuals would be either walking 25+ miles, running something over 30 miles, or some combination of the two.
Long story short, averaging 50,000 steps a day is in fact, either a "big deal", or the user is cheating.
05-09-2016 09:24
05-09-2016 09:24
05-09-2016 09:29
05-09-2016 09:29
Sorry, gotta call you on this one.
What is it you think you've done today to already have 30,000 steps? Have you walked 15 miles? Have you run more like 18 miles?
05-09-2016 09:55
05-09-2016 09:55
05-09-2016 10:03
05-09-2016 10:03
05-09-2016 10:12 - edited 05-09-2016 10:19
05-09-2016 10:12 - edited 05-09-2016 10:19
@SunsetRunner wrote:
Why do people always challenge the distance? The distance done means nothing
Does every marathon runner complete the marathon in the same number of steps? No, why? Because their stride length is different, when will you people get that into your head?
Believe it or not, the relationship between time and distance does not vary as much as you might think. For folks completing marathons in pretty much anything under three hours their cadence is usually within about 5% of 180 strides per minute; for folks completing the same race in under four hours their cadence is usually within 5% of 165 strides per minute. For folks who are even slower, their stride length and/or cadence may vary by even more, however, given their slower pace, their ability to rack up say 50,000 genuine steps day-in and day-out becomes even more suspect.
So, given the relatively stable relationship between time and distance, it is pretty easy to identify when someone is doing something other than walking or running to increase their step count.
@SunsetRunner wrote:
Not to mention, Fitbit only has the option of walking and running, not jogging
To be honest, I think the mods should close these threads and start warning those that create them as they do nothing but create arguments.
All they have to do is use those brain cells to realise that x amount of steps does not equal x amount of miles
Oh, did I mention that the amount of miles done is dependent on what the user has entered as their stride length? Maybe I should post it a few more times, and then maybe people will start realising that it is dependent of what the user has entered and not the actual amount of steps
You do understand there are Fitbit models with built in GPS or tethered GPS which do not require a stride length; yes?
Long story short, if someone says it is "no big deal" to log 50,000 genuine steps in a day, I have to challenge that, I've run as much as 18 miles in a day, I have a relatively short stride (I'm a fat old man), and haven't even come close to 50,000 steps in a single calendar day; heck, I haven't even made it to 40,000 steps.
05-09-2016 10:30
05-09-2016 10:30
05-09-2016 10:41
05-09-2016 10:41
A few comments:
05-09-2016 10:46
05-09-2016 10:46
05-09-2016 10:48
05-09-2016 10:48
So does that mean you're okay with one of the other folks in your various challenges rubbing their hands together for a few hours and logging say 80,000 steps per day?
05-09-2016 10:56
05-09-2016 10:56
05-09-2016 10:57
05-09-2016 10:57
ok last post in this thread I promise
sorry, but a 5'4 person running 1 mile will do it in more steps than someone who is 6'2 running at the same pace, not to mention, leg length, all contributes into the stride length
just because a person is say 5'9, does not mean that they have roughly x length stride, by your reckoning then, everyone that is say 5'9 will have roughly the same walking/jogging/running stride length, sorry, but if their leg length were to be similar or same then yes, but not everyone has the same leg/arm length
lets take myself and my mum, we are of the same height, legs are roughly the same length, yet she has a much shorter stride length, be it walking, jogging or running
a couple of inches difference in leg length may not make alot of difference in say 100m, but the longer the distance, the greater the difference
like I said before, my jogging steps per minute is about 2 steps per second, that means 120 steps per minute, so by your reckoning, I should be able to run a marathon in around 3-4 hours then
and to bring up what you said, marathon runners can complete it in just over 4 hours, and? all that means is that they are fitter than someone than complete it in 8 hours
anyway, goodbye to you all, argue all you want, like I said, I know my step count is legit
I got the fitbit to improve my health, not cheat and make myself number 1 in challenges, so I can boast about it, and if you were to look at some of the challenges I am in, in some of them, I am in the bottom half, and in some cases by over double the number of steps I have done
I also seem to notice that you seem to concern yourself alot in these threads and your profile is private, something you are not telling us? maybe you only join challenges that you know you can win? and dislike it when you come 2nd or lower? maybe you are here just to cause trouble and you get off on it?
anyway, this is my last post in these threads, I have better things to do than continuously argue/prove that my steps are legit, I have nothing to prove, if you don't believe me, then that is your issue not mine