so aside from calories burned the rest of your numbers are so close together, that there really isn't a difference that will amount to much. If you test any two trackers there will be differences. have you ever had your tv set to the same channel at the same time but in different rooms? one tv will be a few beats behind the other. Why, who knows- some techy person can for sure explain it, but in all technology there are slight differences in user experience. Take at work for instance, same wifi, same company computer but logging into a meeting at the same time - one will be spinning and thinking for longer than the other. So unless I got it wrong, and there is a question somewhere in your post, I am thinking the feedback is pretty good all things considered. as far as calories is concerned, the fitbit determines calories based on the HR reading. which is what I am assuming is also what the chest strap did? I know for me a brisk two mile walk is usually around 250 calories but I am a female 50 and 129 pounds. so if we are the same size and gender, then you would probably be the 299 or 300 it is showing you. but if you are not, I think it is underestimated.. my HR is usually in the 90s for this activity. is it possible fitbit is right?
Fitbit Product Experts Alumni are retired members of the Fitbit Product Expert Program. Learn more
Best Answer