Cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Luxe - Clock faces with stats

Replies are disabled for this topic. Start a new one or visit our Help Center.

Why are all the clock faces artsy I bought a watch to have stats not the time and heart rate only?! 

 

Moderator edit:  updated subject for clarity

Best Answer
3 REPLIES 3

To this day I’ve never been able to figure out why they ditched the multi-stat face that was available on the Charge 2 or what vendetta their product management team has against reading time linearly. My best guess on the stats is that pulling all the data at once is too processor intensive and they’re optimizing for battery life, but it’s 2023. Driverless cars are terrorizing San Francisco and my iPhone can identify a succulent at 50 meters. Surely there’s one brave engineer at Google who has the power to show me my heart rate, step count, and distance traveled at the same time. 

I’ve considered applying for a job at Fitbit just to reach the UI team and ask them why they insist on creating only interfaces that are difficult to read and require tap tap tapping to see metrics that could fit on one screen, but my gut tells me the colorful illegible chaos is on purpose, esoteric as that purpose may be - no self-respecting designer could look at these options and believe they’ve created the best possible user experience.

That being said, there is no sleeker fitness tracker out there, and so I continue to wear the Luxe. Good job hardware team! Sorry your software counterparts have chosen violence!

 

Best Answer


Someday this cursed image will be used as a cautionary example in product design coursework (if it isn’t already).

519093FF-00B4-4AEF-90EB-826F6A02DE0B.jpeg

Best Answer
0 Votes

100% agree. These clock faces are absolutely horrible and pretty much useless.  I just don't understand why FB would do this to such a nice tracker. I want a nice classic clock face with the stats visible.  I hate this so much, I'm looking for something else.

Best Answer
0 Votes