02-08-2014 14:38
02-08-2014 14:38
02-09-2014 07:03
02-09-2014 07:03
It would seem to me your "problem" isn't so much how much you eat, but what you eat. You would need to eat more proteins and less fat (or at least switch from "bad" fats to good ones). You would also need to do strength training, so as to gain lean mass (muscle). Given your current weight and the way you look (on your profile's photo), your goal could in fact be to gain weight, but lower your body fat %.
Have you had your body fat % determined? Do you have a Fitbit Aria? I'm in a situation where I want to increase my lean mass and lower my body fat, and I found the Aria useful for that. Some people report wide fluctuations in body fat measurements with their Aria, but I've found it to give very consistent measurements. I have no idea how accurate they are in absolute terms (I have nothing to compare them against), but they are definitely consistent and seem to match changes made in my diet and workouts (been increasing proteins and strength training lately, and that has started to show on the Aria).
Dominique | Finland
Ionic, Aria, Flyer, TrendWeight | Windows 7, OS X 10.13.5 | Motorola Moto G6 (Android 9), iPad Air (iOS 12.4.4)
Take a look at the Fitbit help site for further assistance and information.
02-10-2014 11:32 - edited 02-10-2014 11:49
02-10-2014 11:32 - edited 02-10-2014 11:49
I am a 31 year old mom of two and 5'2, 115 lbs. I eat around 2500 cals to maintain my weight because I work an active job, run an hour a day and lift weights. I lose weight eating 2300 cals or less. Being short has nothing to do with it. I eat about 900-1000 cals by noon. 1500 cals would even be far too little for me to eat, by the end of the day I'd be chewing my left arm off from hunger. I can't dip lower than 2000 cals or I start dreaming about food and am absolutely starving.
Perhaps you're not losing weight at 1500 cals because you feel you should be able to lose 1-2 lbs/week. If you're already a healthy weight you shouldn't be aiming for more than a 1/4-1/2 lb per week loss. When you have little too lose you can't expect to have goals that are too aggressive and suggested for overweight people. Also, activity/exercise helps. If you build muscle, you can eat more because muscle is metabolically active, fat is not.
In my own experience when I try to create too large of a calorie deficit from my calorie needs I experience slower than expected weight loss. The problem is likely a combination of you already being thin plus eating far too little and your body is working against your efforts to prevent starvation. The moment I increase my calories, the scale starts to move again. Try aiming for a deficit of -250 to -300 cals from total daily energy expenditure and see what happens.
02-10-2014 14:30
02-10-2014 14:30
@JenniLacey - Man, do I wish I had your energy!
@Del678 - Im 37, 5'3" and I cannot eat much more than 1000 calories or my weight loss stalls. 🙂
So, I hear ya there. What I am really finding is that I look to achieve the most in terms of nutrients for the calorie. And it looks like you are really doing pretty much the same thing. Have you considered flipping your current diet regime ?
02-11-2014 00:47
02-11-2014 00:47
02-11-2014 00:52
02-11-2014 00:52
02-11-2014 10:34 - edited 02-11-2014 11:04
02-11-2014 10:34 - edited 02-11-2014 11:04
I didn't always have these energy levels. They came from losing 60 lbs, getting fit and drastically cleaning up my diet.
1 lb/week at your weight is a huge loss. In fact, it's probably too aggressive. As a PP pointed out, building muscle and actually gaining weight should really help. Then you can always go back and cut fat with a small deficit while continuing to lift weights. This will help improve your body composition and clear up those wobbly bits.
I can't count the number of women I see that believe the answer to a healthy body is starvation level diets and weight loss and then wonder why it isn't working. Not all weight = bad weight and body composition is far more important than scale weight. The less you eat, the more you're going to slow your metabolism. The more muscle you lose through weight loss, the more you'll slow your metabolism.
As strange as it may sound, if you want a healthy fit body and to be able to eat more than bird food. You're going to have to eat more, build back some muscle and toss your scale in the closet. Take body measurements instead. I'm not sure what sort of advice you're being given but any nutritionist that thinks eat 900 cals a day is going to help you to build muscle and isn't telling you that eating so little is actually hurting more than helping, I would be questioning. Especially an ex bodybuilder who doesn't know you need to gain weight with a calorie surplus to build muscle and that starvation diets wreak havoc on your metabolism and will not result in gaining muscle as your body fights to use every calorie to prevent starvation. That would tell me he doesn't even know the fundamentals of body building, let alone proper nutrition.
02-12-2014 01:37
02-12-2014 01:37
02-17-2014 11:11 - edited 02-17-2014 11:13
02-17-2014 11:11 - edited 02-17-2014 11:13
Del, I feel your pain. I am stuck here 'round the 1200 cal/ day unless I significantly increase my exercise and I am 5'6". Blame it on age, slow metabolism, TS, hormones, whatever, but I try to look on the bright side... I need less food, that is good, right? I sent you a friend request, my food log is visible to friends if you want to see what I log every day.