12-31-2013 14:28
12-31-2013 14:28
I'm having trouble increasing my protein and cutting the carbs. Any suggestions?
12-31-2013 14:56
12-31-2013 14:56
whats your typical diet look like right now?
12-31-2013 15:05
12-31-2013 15:05
12-31-2013 15:53
12-31-2013 15:53
Protein at 20% doesn't sound too bad too me.
I eat about 20% protein, 20% carbs and 60% fat. I try to squeeze in 20 to 30 fiber grams too. My carbs primarily come from vegetables and nuts, with very few starchy vegetables, no sugar, no grains, and only a couple ounces of fruit every other day. I think that qualifies as a low carb diet. A low carb diet isn't a no carb diet.
Are you willing to share the percentages or grams for protein, carbs, fat, and fiber in your diet now? And the typical calorie count you aim for?
Because I'm very active and on a calorie restricted diet, it is a challenge for me to get enough protein. I try to get 80 grams per day. In a typical day this includes eggs, cottage cheese, yogurt, almonds, peanuts, hard cheese, soft mozzarella cheese, and 3 oz of meat or fish at dinner. Other foods just as good include tuna, canned oysters, sardines, canned salmon, chicken, turkey, peanut butter, almond butter (I put those nut butters on celery), sausage, ham, shrimp, and seeds such as sunflower or pumpkin. Protein and egg powders can also be added to green smoothies but I usually steer away from processed food.
And while pinto beans are high carb, I do include them every couple days because they are loaded with protein. I never have any trouble meeting my protein and fiber goals if I have 1/2 cup of beans.
Finally some veggies pack a good protein punch including spinach, broccoli, kale, swiss chard, and pea pods. If you include at least one of those veggies at all three meals, the protein contribution adds up.
12-31-2013 18:58
12-31-2013 18:58
Good advice, and thanks for the suggestions of what to eat. After using the food log for 5 days, I can see where my problem lies - I'm taking in 47% of my calories in carbs, and only 13% is protein. No wonder I'm not losing weight, even though I'm not going over my daily allowance for total calories eaten. I love my Fitbit!
12-31-2013 22:06
12-31-2013 22:06
From what I've read - I'm no expert - choosing what your macro-nutrient ratio should be depends on your body type. It would be presumptious to assume that you're wanting to lose fat.
If indeed it is fat you want to lose - getting more protein can never hurt you. Never. It's the best stuff. But - it's not much good without some of the other stuff - carbs and fats.
To increase your protein intake - you might want to figure out how many grams of protein you want in your diet. How much is enough for what you're trying to accomplish?
Let's just assume that you want more protein. I suggest going to Wal-Mart and getting a protein supplement. Don't spend a gazillion dollars - just spend about 16-18 dollars on 21 servings worth 30 grams of protein a serving. The typical scoop is 1/3 of a cup. I've read that our bodies aren't going to absorb much more than 10 grams of protein at a time, so you may as well just get 2-3 tablespoons and mix it with water, almond milk or cow's milk, depending on your preference. I have a protein shake for breakfast with other goodies mixed in - fruit and oatmeal - and take 2 small (8 oz) smoothies to work for midmorning and midafternoon snacks.
For me, trying to lose fat - I want to be as sure as I can that my body has enough protein to maintain the muscle I have. It takes a lot of effort to build muscle, so I think it's best to try to maintain what I have.
Alternatively, there's always egg white omelets.
01-01-2014 05:58 - edited 01-01-2014 06:39
01-01-2014 05:58 - edited 01-01-2014 06:39
There's no reason you shouldn't be losing weight on a 47% carb intake. I ate around that and lost 60 lbs in 8 months. Carbs don't make you fat, fat doesn't make you fat, etc. The amount of calories you take in, determines if you lose weight or not. I've seen people lose plenty of weight on a 65% carb intake. The recommendations are 45-65% carbs, you are at the bottom of that intake.
20% protein is fine and it's really a personal choice and comes down to individual requirements/needs how you divide up your other two macronutrients. Whether you want to go the low carb, high fat or high carb, low fat or moderate carb/fat route. Personally, I don't think it really matters, what matters is the kind of food that makes up those macros and finding a way of eating you can maintain even after weight loss. Are your fats coming from fast food burgers and fries? Or nuts and avocadoes? Are your carbs coming from veg, fruit, whole grains, legumes? Or are they coming from Captain Crunch cereal and cookies?
Personally, I choose "healthy" foods because they help best with satiaty and are best for my health. After I get my protein for weight lifting, my other macros fall where they lie. Usually a middle of the road breakdown of 25-35% fats and 40-50% carbs. Eating clean helps to keep calories low from non-filling foods and can be used for more filling foods. If I eat something high in sugar or a sugar/fat combo, it causes me to crave it like mad and binge on it... which leads to overeating. So I avoid those types of foods save for special occassions on an already full belly. I know some people that find grains to be their trigger food and will need to avoid them in which case, a low carb approach may be better suited for them.
High sugar and high sodium foods will cause you to retain more fluid which can mask fat loss. If you are new to exercising, it can also cause fluid retention that will mask fat loss. It's also very, very easy to make human errors when tracking your food, estimating calories burned. You may not be creating a calorie deficit at all and this is why you're not losing weight. Make sure you are weighing and measuring what you eat and being honest with yourself. I have seen many people have trouble losing weight when they eat too little and as soon as they bump their calorie intake up by a few hundred calories, they start to lose.
I think it's overkill to go low carb unless you are morbidly obese OR you plan on treating low carb as a lifestyle and are doing it because you feel it is a healtheir way to eat; you plan on keeping it up for life. If you are just doing it for general weight loss, I think it is a poor choice and unnecessary. If you don't learn how to eat in a healthy way and learn healthy habits, that you can maintain for life while losing... returning to old habits will just cause the weight to creep back in. Although a low carb approach does boast bigger weight loss numbers for the first 6-12 months, if you can't maintain that way of eating after all the fanfare on the scale. You'll find yourself quickly at square one again. Learn to eat for life.
01-01-2014 06:54
01-01-2014 06:54
01-01-2014 07:29 - edited 01-01-2014 07:30
01-01-2014 07:29 - edited 01-01-2014 07:30
I know what you mean. I've been tracking, measuring and weighing for a year and a half and I still make mistakes when estimating the calories I eat. Even when paying extra close attention, it happens. After awhile we tend to get a bit lazy with it and have to remind ourselves to pay closer attention.
I have found that playing around with my calorie intake does help for some reason. If I was eating rather low calories for awhile, I'd boost my intake for month or more by a couple hundred a day and then lower it again the following month. I'd also do calorie cycling where I ate some low cal days, some medium and some high at maintenance. It always seemed to bust me through plateaus and get the scale moving again.
01-01-2014 09:19
01-01-2014 09:19
I, too, previously lost 55 lb on a low fat high carb diet. Over a 10 year period, I regained about half of that, and that's what I'm working on now.
I agree the research confirms that it doesn't really matter how you balance your macronutrients for weight loss if your calories are sufficiently restricted.
Example. A group of obese people confined to a research ward of a hospital were fed liquid diets. For one observation period they received a high carb low fat diet. For another the same group received a low carb high fat diet. They lost equal pounds of weight regardless of the macronutrient balance. Other studies say the same result doesn't happen when test subjects ate real food (vs liquid food). The body is more efficient in absorbing carbohydrates which dissolve easily, and less efficient in breaking down proteins and fats, somewhat more of which pass out of the digestive track unused or convert to body heat. However the overall differences in weight loss were very small.
So bottom line, a lack of weight loss is probably due to reasons other than macronutrient balance, not all of which have to do with a poor accounting of calories or not exercising enough.
If you aren't losing weight, look at total caloric intake first, but if you are tracking carefully, then accept that your body is trying to hang onto body weight to protect you from famine. That's a healthy body response. The body can become very thrify in how it uses calories and will drop metabolic burn if necessary (even with a lot of exercise) to hang on to body weight. Or it will slow down the digestive process to extract more nutrients from the food you do eat. One sign your metabolism has cooled down is feeling more chilled than others in the same room or the same bed! Be patient with your plan and kind to your body as it will eventually give up excess fat. And accept that after your weight loss occurs, you may not be able to return to a 2000 calorie a day diet. You may have a more efficient body that will do just fine on 1400 or 1600 calories a day.
I want to comment on why I would choose low carb after a lifetime of using a low fat diet instead. I don't agree low carb is "over kill" or primarily for the morbidly obese even though it's weight loss outcomes are about the same as high carb.
I'm nearly 60 and have lived with the "high carb" recommendations most of my adult life. And frankly, in light of recent research and a new health diagnosis in my family, I'm kind of furious with USDA for making low fat high carb recommendations. So bear with me please and don't take anything I say as an attack on others who believe differently. The research is still ambiguous so each of us must find our own way.
My husband is 5'11" and 164 lb. He is slim (BMI under 23) except for a paunch. We have an organic farm and are dedicated to healthy chemical free produce and grass fed meat. He exercises daily caring for livestock and tending pastures, mostly done on foot. Since the food pyramid came out twenty plus years ago, he has eaten a high carb diet primarily made up of whole grains such as whole wheat pasta and bread. He has prediabetes. He has no family history of diabetes. He had open heart surgery for a blockage to his left main coronary artery. No family history of heart attack. A low carb diet alone - one prescribed by his cardiologist with no calorie counting at all and no restrictions on fat intake - helped him lose 6 pounds, three inches off the waist line, and reduced his blood glucose to a normal (near 100) level, whereas it was 125 before starting low carb. For him, low carb is a healthier diet for his insulin system and weight distributuion regardless of any weight loss goals.
I don't have prediabetes. I'm overweight but not clinically obese. I started the fitbit program 25 lb. overweight and lost 13 of those pounds in 7 weeks. BTW I didn't lose any weight in Week 1 and just broke through a 10 day plateau so the weight loss hasn't been even. That isn't any better than my weight loss rate on high carbs.
But I have had health problems with high carb low fat diets, even when I wasn't trying to lose weight. These included exercise related hypoglycemia and dizziness, dry skin, constipation, and nearly daily heart burn and acid reflux. I also felt hungry most of the time. When I moved to a lower carb, higher fat diet (with some serious effort to reach the fiber goals), all those health symptoms went away. I no longer feel hungry between meals. I start feeling hungry about 30 minutes before mealtime. I haven't taken an antacid tablet since I started, whereas I was taking a couple tablets after exercise and a couple before bedtime almost every day on a high carb (>50%) diet.
I know I can lose weight with higher carb intake, but I have much better compliance with a higher fat diet with fewer hunger cravings and a greater sense of general wellbeing. If I can lose weight and enjoy more delicious dietary fat ... then that's a great bonus. This is a lifestyle diet that goes beyond weight loss, one I can maintain over years. I know from experience that I struggle to maintain a low fat diet (one below 40% fat calories).
I genuinely believe there is some evolutionary wisdom behind the low carb high fat movement and research, which is well underway now, will bear out the hypothesis that this is a safe, sane, long term option for many people.
01-01-2014 10:33
01-01-2014 10:33
01-01-2014 10:41
01-01-2014 10:41
01-01-2014 10:47
01-01-2014 10:47
01-01-2014 12:04
01-01-2014 12:04
01-01-2014 12:55
01-01-2014 12:55
Thanks for your story. Eye opening to say the least.
01-02-2014 16:19
01-02-2014 16:19
I've lost my weight on 80% carbs. low carb never worked for me. It doesn't for a lot of women especially those who have thyroid issues. Dr. Atkins addressed this in some articles he wrote many years ago.
01-10-2014 09:55
01-10-2014 09:55
I am very interested in what you eat daily?
01-10-2014 11:02
01-10-2014 11:02
friend me, my daily logs are visible to my friends...
01-10-2014 13:50
01-10-2014 13:50
01-11-2014 15:04
01-11-2014 15:04