01-11-2015 03:42
01-11-2015 03:42
01-11-2015 05:35
01-11-2015 05:35
01-11-2015 15:06
01-11-2015 15:06
01-11-2015 15:46
01-11-2015 15:46
This sounds like something that could be affected by what activity level you have set yourself at on MFP and whether or not you have "calorie estimation" enabled on Fitbit. But it looks to me (IMHO) like you are just starting out on this whole thing. If so, you might want to just aim for something in between the two numbers that MFP and Fitbit are giving you until you get enough information logged to establish trends - a couple of weeks at least and if female maybe a couple of months to establish a baseline to refer to.
Good luck
01-11-2015 17:32
01-11-2015 17:32
01-11-2015 17:47
01-11-2015 17:47
01-11-2015 19:49 - edited 01-11-2015 19:52
01-11-2015 19:49 - edited 01-11-2015 19:52
Ditto's to NOT trying to follow 2 roads to the same destination, even if you think you have both settings the same.
Even if a man isn't driving, that's just asking for frustration. Let MFP be your diet/eating goals, Fitbit being the exercise/daily burn goals.
For one big thing, MFP does NOT include exercise in the daily maintenance figure, from which it takes a deficit for your eating goal. So initial goal is merely daily life no exercise, and that's the only day it would apply to.
When you actually do the exercise and log it, daily maintenance goes up, and therefore so does eating goal.
Fitbit synced to MFP allows correction of that daily maintenance figure (since you could only select from 4 levels), so then you can truly eat less than you burn. Which is all that is needed to lose weight.
But hopefully by a reasonable amount to sustain only fat loss, not by big amount to cause muscle mass loss and fail in the whole endevour either during the loss or in maintenance. As so many do fail then and gain weight or more back, but more fat then.
One kicker though, if exercise is not step based, you need to manually log it in Fitbit so the daily burn is more accurate picture.
That way eating goal is still reasonable.
Oh, and that initial difference is the fact MFP uses Mifflin BMR as basis to math, Fitbit uses something close but undisclosed to it, unually within 10-30 calories. Once BMR is brought to daily burn, that can turn in to 15-50 off.
But neither matters, because as soon as you burn more than that initial sedentary estimate, the math starts on what your reported burn is.
Oh yeah, to the difference during the day of how much left to eat - confirm MFP is getting a recent sync form Fitbit regarding daily burn.
Go to Exercise tab in MFP, the calorie adjustment entry has an "i" there to click on, it'll tell you when and what the calorie amount was. If not recent, then you got a sync still coming or in error. Either sync the Fitbit again to account, so there is new figure for Fitbit to send over to MFP, or wait.
But confirm that is showing recent calorie adjustment.
Then you can meet your daily eating goal.