My wife is on Cpap (actually Apap) for mild sleep apnea. So I've a particular interest in the Fitbit (versa 2) observation of O2 levels.
We have shown these EOV graphs to her Dr, and HE asks the following question: " Variation from what? Is the current O2 level compared with the previous measurement, or the average over the past few minutes, or over the past hour? "
On the other hand he is impressed with the pulse rate graphs, as those are clearly marked, and can be scanned as 5 minute averages. Pulse Rate variations (for my wife indicative of AFib episodes) are very useful and actually provide a record of Afib events. Unfortunately the Estimated Oxygen Variation graphic is useless without a full explanation of the Y-Axis.
That is really unfortunate, because the watch actually displays the estimated O2 levels, and bluetooths all that data to the app, the programming of the app, apparently decides to be "cute" and processes the individual readings into a graphic that neither I, my wife's PCP, nor her sleep doctor and understand.
I recently talked with Fitbit rep, where my question had been "escalated" and waited a week to get the "more advanced team" response. What they told me was that the 'line" between high variation and low variation was actually at 95% Oxygen Saturation. The "high zone" is between 95 to 98%, the "low zone" is between 92 to 95%. That makes no sense at all.
Suggestion to Fitbit: Just report the data that was collected, average it over some period of time (like pulse rate), and graph the O2 values (like is done with pulse rate) and let us and our medical providers decide what is high or low variability, and if it is medically significant.
Please do not tell us to take our EOV graphic to our medical consultant, if he can't interpret that graphic or the magnitude.