05-08-2016 21:00
05-08-2016 21:00
05-08-2016 23:41
05-08-2016 23:41
There have been a number of people affected with band issues with both the Surge and Charge HR. The problem is made worse because with both of these fitbit models the band is not replaceable as the electronics are built into it.
However, not everyone has this problem - I had no issues with my Surge - and it's hard to judge the possibility that you would.
If this concerns you though then you might do better to consider the fitbit Blaze instead. The advantage is that the bands are replaceable so if you did have an issue then it would be easy to resolve. As well as that I think the Blaze is much nicer than either the Charge HR or Surge (I have had both in the past).
05-09-2016 01:59
05-09-2016 01:59
@SteveH: Thanks a lot for replying and giving a frank opinion. However i have even thought about Blaze as you mentioned but I was guessing if I am gonna pay for a device like Blaze, wouldnt it be nicer to have an inbuilt GPS as well?
05-09-2016 02:03
05-09-2016 02:03
05-09-2016 02:57
05-09-2016 02:57
Well @SteveH thats eaxctly why I am trying to bounce off as many questions of the wall here and find out more before I actually push in for the purchase. I am really unsure about GPS as having it would be great but i wont die without it 🙂 Anyways i usually cycle and run, more of cycling....I feel if this watch can give me at least 2-3 years, provided I maintain it well, i will go for Blaze cause i agree its classy and sporty both.
05-09-2016 08:19
05-09-2016 08:19
05-09-2016 08:48
05-09-2016 08:48
My feeling is, if you don't "need" GPS on a regular basis, then you'll be better served with a Blaze which will allow you to do the GPS thing via a "tether" to your phone.
The above said, I typically go on at least 20 long trail runs per month and I hate carrying a phone when I run so that pretty much rules out anything but a Surge. The good news is I have had mine for over a year, and while there are some wear spots at each of the four corners where the tracker and band are bonded together, the band itself is perfectly serviceable.
05-09-2016 11:38
05-09-2016 11:38
05-09-2016 11:40
05-09-2016 11:40
05-09-2016 12:57
05-09-2016 12:57
When I say "serviceable" I mean, the band has some cosmetic wear at the corners, but functions as well as it did when it was brand new.
05-10-2016 06:46
05-10-2016 06:46
Great question, and good for you for asking before buying. I would not buy any Fitbit product without a replaceable band as the seemingly numerous problems with the bands make the devices useless since they can't be replaced. I have a Surge with a failing band and Fitbit would do nothing other than offer 25% off the purchase of a new tracker (that's Fitbit's standard offer now for units out of warranty--pretty sad). As others have said, I would look at the Blaze if GPS is not an issue. There are other companies besides Fitbit--as you can probably tell, I'm a bit bitter over spending $250 for a product that barely lasted over a year and Fitbit won't stand behind their product or even admit that there is design flaw in the Surge bands.
05-10-2016 13:12
05-10-2016 13:12
I have to agree. The Surge isn't repairable so if anything fails once you are out of warranty then you will have to buy a new one (or something else). I'm sure the same is true of most if not all competing products, the problem is that the Surge doesn't seem to be very reliable.
I'm on my third now (two replacements under warranty) and to their credit Fitbit have been very good at sending out the replacements. My concern is what happens once the warranty expires. If I have to buy a replacement it certainly won't be a Surge. The only Fitbit device I would consider is the Blaze where there won;t be problems with the strap breaking.