Pop Watch Face Bottom Cut Off

[harty646]

Is the Pop face supposed to have to the bottom cut off and look to low on watch screen?

[Rich_Laue]

Scroll it up.

[MarkD78 · Accepted solution]

Yes, that's the design of it.  I really like that one despite a lot of people saying they don't!  

[racertempo · Accepted solution]

---

@MarkD78 wrote:

Yes, that's the design of it.  I really like that one despite a lot of people saying they don't!  

---

I like that one for one simple reason, I can do one tap on the screen and see my steps.  I know classic shows steps as well without a tap, but I do lean towards the Pop.

[Yippyman]

I have filed a feature request to get this looked into.

For those of us finding that the clipped "Pop" watch face a bug (design flaw) rather than a intended design style, please help voting the feature request below to get this addressed...

https://community.fitbit.com/t5/Feature-Requests/Blaze-s-Pop-Clock-Face-is-clipped-at-the-bottom/idi...

Thanks!

[MikeF]

I think I'd struggle to class a design I wasn't fond of as a bug. Hopefully further faces will be forthcoming.

[Carolingalong]

---

@MarkD78 wrote:

Yes, that's the design of it.  I really like that one despite a lot of people saying they don't!  

---

I like it too! It's still readable, and it looks cool.

[racertempo]

---

@Carolingalong wrote:

---

@MarkD78 wrote:

Yes, that's the design of it.  I really like that one despite a lot of people saying they don't!  

---

I like it too! It's still readable, and it looks cool.

---

Be careful.....lots of people on here would argue with you that the Pop face is not "functional" and there is a mistake by fitbit.    I am not one of those people.

[MFM106]

I feel the cut-off time numbers look bad. With the rest of the graphic design of the watch looking so elegant, this watch face seems to fall below the high bar set otherwise. It is ambiguous and annoying to look at numbers that seem to have slid down below the edge of the screen. If this is intended, I think it's a strange and poor decision. For that matter, why stop there, why not cut the numbers in half? I would vote for a slightly smaller font, which is also slightly less bold and the numbers raised, showing a little black beneath them. It's disappointing that this watch face is so obviously marred/poorly designed. Further, I'm looking forward to more watch face options. They don't have to super clever--just simple, functional and visually interesting. Simplicity, not intricacy would be my choice. But, others may differ.

[Safvi]

Yes.

[AngelaMa]

Hello @Safvi, @harty646, @MFM106, @racertempo and @Carolingalong! Thanks for taking the time to share your feedback about the Pop Clock face. This is the clock face I use, not only because I can see my information with just one tap, but I really like the colors and how it looks with my plum wristband.  Also as @MarkD78 mentioned it was designed to look like that and I don't mind the cut off numbers. This is the main reason  @Yippyman shared the Pop Clock face  request, if you dislike it you can add your comments to this idea or if you want more clock faces to be added to the Blaze you can vote for the idea to add More Watch Faces For Blaze, the more votes it gets, more opportunities it has to be noticed by our developers. 

Let me know if you have any questions! 🙂