Cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Fitbit Charge 5 is not properly recording my steps for stairclimber. My workout is a 1/2 hour each.

ANSWERED
Replies are disabled for this topic. Start a new one or visit our Help Center.

Here is a sample:

DFosket_0-1698151110365.png

 

Best Answer
0 Votes
1 BEST ANSWER

Accepted Solutions

That's the first you mentioned calories.  If you look at calories, don't they look reasonable, even though step count is low?

Fitbit doesn't just assign undetected steps, figuring that you must have been taking them, though that is an interesting thought.

Before, you were just talking about steps.  Calories are based on heart rate.  Step count does not necessarily affect calorie burn, except that with more steps you probably are working harder and raising your heart rate.  But if, say, you could raise your heart rate with a hand cycle, no legs involved, you could still burn as many calories with no steps, no matter what type exercise you called it.

And actually the selection of exercise really makes little difference other than for your personal history and for determining which stats to show.

Before posting, re-read to see if it would make sense to someone else not looking at your Fitbit or phone.

View best answer in original post

Best Answer
0 Votes
5 REPLIES 5

FItbit, or any tracker worn on wrist, can only infer steps from movement of arms.  Perhaps on stairclimber you are holding both rails and not getting normal arm swing as if walking.  If perhaps you could let Fitbit arm swing free, you would get steps counted.  Alternately put Fitbit in a pocket and get good step count but lose heart rate and associated calorie burn.

Before posting, re-read to see if it would make sense to someone else not looking at your Fitbit or phone.

Best Answer

Wow...I don't know anybody that uses the stairclimber without holding on the handles...dangerous to let go!  I guess I'll just live with the results as is. Too bad I can't adjust the steps on my dashboard.

 

Best Answer
0 Votes

It's the same issue many places: treadmill, pushing shopping cart or baby carriage.  Trouble is something on wrist cannot directly know what your legs are doing, can only infer from rhythmic swinging of arms as when walking.  Some people get extender straps and wear around ankle but iffy if get heart rate.  Other side of this is that if you stand still and just swing your arms as if walking, Fitbit credits steps.  Fitbit does have filters to try to distinguish random arm move movements from steps but is not perfect at that.

Before posting, re-read to see if it would make sense to someone else not looking at your Fitbit or phone.

Best Answer

My bad....I assumed that when selecting an exercise, the coding would look at heart rate to estimate the steps or calories spent, depending on the exercise.

Best Answer
0 Votes

That's the first you mentioned calories.  If you look at calories, don't they look reasonable, even though step count is low?

Fitbit doesn't just assign undetected steps, figuring that you must have been taking them, though that is an interesting thought.

Before, you were just talking about steps.  Calories are based on heart rate.  Step count does not necessarily affect calorie burn, except that with more steps you probably are working harder and raising your heart rate.  But if, say, you could raise your heart rate with a hand cycle, no legs involved, you could still burn as many calories with no steps, no matter what type exercise you called it.

And actually the selection of exercise really makes little difference other than for your personal history and for determining which stats to show.

Before posting, re-read to see if it would make sense to someone else not looking at your Fitbit or phone.

Best Answer
0 Votes