09-22-2023 01:54
09-22-2023 01:54
in previous posts, I read that RHR not taken into account when activity suchvas walking is involved. If so, how can you explain that I passed from a 58 RHB to 65 (and lost 3pts on my cardio fitness score) but if I analyze the graphs it is clearly below 60, so to achieve a score of 65 the very first thing in the morning, it has to take into account when I get up and walk. I was about to seek medical attention when I thought of comparing past graphs ! to my surprise the only difference is the score given!! Glad to see I’m not the only one . Was the change in the algorythm made to merge Fitbit to Google ?
09-22-2023 08:28 - edited 09-22-2023 08:28
09-22-2023 08:28 - edited 09-22-2023 08:28
Sorry, but I'm having trouble understanding your points. 'RHR taken into account for walking' - taken into account how? for what? for some king of calculation? Is this all about cardio fitness score? Or is this about resting heart rate? You talk of analyzing the graphs - which graphs? score of 65 first thing in the morning - what score is this?
09-22-2023 08:54
09-22-2023 08:54
09-22-2023 09:24
09-22-2023 09:24
You might have a mistaken idea about resting heart rate. RHR is basically just your heart rate when you are at rest, and well-rested. To quote Fitbit: "Resting heart rate is the number of times your heart beats per minute when you’re still and well-rested." Fitbit does not reveal how they calculate this, but it is not just some average you can get by looking at your heart rates during the day and excluding times such as when you are walking. And it does not vary substantially, if at all, during the day. It generally moves slowly, generally varying only 1 or 2 bpm per day. Its usefulness is to look at trends over probably at least a week to perhaps see if can tell when getting it, or perhaps to see changes in fitness over even longer periods of time.
09-24-2023 01:51
09-24-2023 01:51