01-05-2025 17:31
01-05-2025 17:31
Others like walking and rowing are fine.. Please Fix
03-18-2025 03:39
03-18-2025 03:39
03-18-2025 07:34
03-18-2025 07:34
@hovdeo I spin with the Fitbit on my ankle and a different HR monitor on my wrist. I try to make sure they are reading similar heart rate before I get on the bike. The device does seem to be more sensitive to positioning on the ankle than the wrist. I really struggled with that initially and it was very frustrating.
I don't bother trying to compare Active Zone Minutes and Cardio Load. They are measuring things differently and it's rare for them to be similar. For instance, here's a spin ride I did over the weekend.
03-18-2025 10:50
03-18-2025 10:50
The Cardio Load is an implementation of TRIMP (Training Impulse). TRIMP, in its simplest format, is Time x Intensity. I have read several papers measuring TRIMP but they all seem to have different ways of figuring the intensity factor. Some implementations have a "scaling factor" based on the exercise you are engaged in.
Fitbit is woefully neglect in providing any detail onto how they calculate exercise intensity. It's clear they use some kind exercise scaling factor to calculate their score. Whatever algorithm they use, it appears to undervalue spinning. (I get more points sitting in a chair cooling down than I get for a rigorous spin.) I sure wish Fitbit would at least make their measurement algorithm known so I can understand why this disparity occurs and how I could correct for it.
03-19-2025 02:49
03-19-2025 02:49
Cardio Load targets and monitoring are totally crap on Charger 6. I get targets like 202 - 229 (= today) and others way over my safe active HR zone - I'm 78 YEARs OLD with a minimal exercise lifestyle and chronic CVD. Besides, my exercise sessions always show having had a Cardio Load 0, even when my session has been intence, showing having peak HR minutes in the Heart Rate monitoring and Activity!!!