help menu

Join us on the Community Forums!

  • Community Guidelines

    The Fitbit Community is a gathering place for real people who wish to exchange ideas, solutions, tips, techniques, and insight about the Fitbit products and services they love. By joining our Community, you agree to uphold these guidelines, so please take a moment to look them over.

  • Learn the Basics

    Check out our Frequently Asked Questions page for information on Community features, and tips to make the most of your time here.

  • Join the Community!

    Join an existing conversation, or start a new thread to ask your question. Creating your account is completely free, and takes about a minute.

Not finding your answer on the Community Forums?

Cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Weird split time error

Replies are disabled for this topic. Start a new one or visit our Help Center.

‎10-03-2017 02:32

‎10-03-2017 02:32

Hi, I had the same problem with the the Surge, and it happens with the Ionic too.  The way runs are displayed on the fitbit site has changed a bit so I can't take a screen shot for evidence, but it's about the figure that the Ionic or the Surge give me for the pace of my half mile split when I run.  This refers to the figure that is displayed on the watch face, and the figure that used to be displayed on the website.  It's often off by a few seconds.  Say, for example, as I was running this morning, I ran my first split in 3.49 for half a mile, if my memory serves me correctly,  and it gave me a pace of 7.30 min/mile.  Obviously the average pace is simply twice the time of the split.  It's strange, and not very helpful, even though it's only ever an error of 2 or 3 seconds a mile or so.

Best Answer
0 Votes
4 REPLIES 4

‎10-03-2017 02:34

‎10-03-2017 02:34

I did try, for interest, the 400m split option too, but the pace results it was showing me seemed even more suspicious.

Best Answer
0 Votes

‎10-19-2017 13:35

In response to MattyW

‎10-19-2017 13:35

Wow, this problem is BAD. I walked 2 miles today and noticed it was way way way off.  At 0.5 I got there in 7:32, and it showed a pace of 19:20.  Even worse.....at 1.0 mile my total walk time was 16:15, but my split pace was again around 19:25.  This continued for the 1.5 split.  Then at the 2.0 split it is like it corrected all at once as it showed a rediculous walking split of 12:20.

 

As you noted, it corrected them all at the end, in the summary and in the app, but what a complete and total waste and screwed up function. 

Best Answer
0 Votes

‎10-19-2017 13:44

In response to racertempo

‎10-19-2017 13:44

I think the time shown at the 'cue' is your current pace, not the average pace of the cue or split.  And it is useless especially on a walk.  It is never close to my 16' 00" mile that I would expect.

Best Answer
0 Votes

‎10-19-2017 16:27

In response to dermbrian

‎10-19-2017 16:27

@dermbrian wrote:

I think the time shown at the 'cue' is your current pace, not the average pace of the cue or split.  And it is useless especially on a walk.  It is never close to my 16' 00" mile that I would expect.

No way.  I use the current pace screen and I never get into the 19:20s on a walk of 16:45 miles. 

Best Answer
0 Votes