12-17-2019 10:27
12-17-2019 10:27
Why is this now available on only some Charge 3 and Versas?
Answered! Go to the Best Answer.
01-26-2020 13:26
01-26-2020 13:26
Mmmm... A delta between 1minute samples... I did not think it that way. I rather think it's a delta wrt to some reference. I'll further investigate and cross compare with your results.
01-26-2020 14:16
01-26-2020 14:16
My graphs disappeared a few days ago. How do I get them back?
01-26-2020 14:23
01-26-2020 14:23
01-26-2020 14:38
01-26-2020 14:38
Shannon -- I don't know of any way to get them back other than to wait until they magically reappear (if they ever do). You can download your data archive from Fitbit, though, and it should include the raw data, but with no explanation of how to interpret it.
01-26-2020 15:16
01-26-2020 15:16
My estimated oxygen variation graph has disappeared from my versa 2 log, and it is no.longer recording it?
01-26-2020 23:07
01-26-2020 23:07
01-27-2020 00:33
01-27-2020 00:33
Mine EOV data also disappeared tonight. When this happened before, rebooting my iPhone and Versa 2 fixed it but not this time. Anyone have a fix?
01-27-2020 01:31
01-27-2020 01:31
01-27-2020 04:36
01-27-2020 04:36
01-27-2020 13:14
01-27-2020 13:14
I was seeing the EOVs for a few weeks but they are no longer there. ??
01-27-2020 18:18
01-27-2020 18:18
Someone asked what it was possible to learn from the limited data (well, really just a tiny chart) that Fitbit provided. A really-good question, since of course it isn't nearly as data-rich as actual readings. My speculation is that since SPO2 can't really go up dramatically from its normal values (which are 95%+), dramatic changes during sleep (the only time that the Fitbit data was reporting) are potential warning signs of Apnea events. But since it isn't medically-approved to diagnose Apnea, the rapid change is all that Fitbit can report.
In fairness to Fitbit, that makes some sense, but without being able to see the actual values and the amount of time that lower SPO2 readings were reported, it is hard to know what to do with the data. But providing that information might require FDA approval for its veracity?
01-27-2020 18:25
01-27-2020 18:25
01-27-2020 18:41
01-27-2020 18:41
pbug56 -- There is an FDA approval process for pulse-oximeters. My impression is that you can't simply report what you say is a person's SPO2 willy-nilly, whether or not you or I think that is an arbitrary regulation. I'm not even close to an expert in this area, and happy to hear from those who are, but as an example FDA guideline: https://www.fda.gov/media/72470/download
01-27-2020 18:51
01-27-2020 18:51
01-27-2020 22:18
01-27-2020 22:18
For what it’s worth the EVO data is back.
01-27-2020 22:25
01-27-2020 22:25
01-28-2020 00:10
01-28-2020 00:10
According to FDA documents something is to be classified as a medical device, for the purpose of regulation, if it is intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals.
A fancy watch that can suggest a greater or lesser likelihood of apnea is most certainly such a diagnosis tool and thus subject to regulation. This would cause fees for publicly traded companies like Fitbit to start at $100K and rapidly goes up from there. The 2.3% Obamacare medical device fee has recently been repealed at least for now but may return with future administrations.
It is easy to underestimate the cost and difficulty of introducing a de novo product in such a regulated environment.
There is currently exemptions for "rare" diseases, but not applicable for common sleep disorder.
I guess it's up to the current and possibly future administrations to correct this and fix these shortcomings.
01-28-2020 04:14
01-28-2020 04:14
Mine is too! Thanks for letting us know!
01-28-2020 05:21
01-28-2020 05:21
The EVO is back! Just reappeared this morning.
01-28-2020 05:45
01-28-2020 05:45