help menu

Join us on the Community Forums!

  • Community Guidelines

    The Fitbit Community is a gathering place for real people who wish to exchange ideas, solutions, tips, techniques, and insight about the Fitbit products and services they love. By joining our Community, you agree to uphold these guidelines, so please take a moment to look them over.

  • Learn the Basics

    Check out our Frequently Asked Questions page for information on Community features, and tips to make the most of your time here.

  • Join the Community!

    Join an existing conversation, or start a new thread to ask your question. Creating your account is completely free, and takes about a minute.

Not finding your answer on the Community Forums?

Cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Apple Watch vs Blaze

Replies are disabled for this topic. Start a new one or visit our Help Center.

‎11-01-2016 12:35

‎11-01-2016 12:35

I think that the Blaze should have most (if not all) the features of the Apple Watch
Best Answer
0 Votes
3 REPLIES 3

‎11-01-2016 14:57

‎11-01-2016 14:57

The Blaze was never designed to be an AW alternative, which basically acts like a smart remote display for the watch. 

Best Answer
0 Votes

‎11-01-2016 17:06

‎11-01-2016 17:06

The Apple watches are designed for longevity while the Blaze is evidently a throw away after one replacement type of product!
Best Answer
0 Votes

‎11-01-2016 17:23

In response to Outcasted2003

‎11-01-2016 17:23

Only the Apple Watch Sport with its sapphire screen might be, but even with this coating Consumer Reports was able to scratch it. 

The standard AW has the same glass is the Blaze with plenty of failure reported. 

Considering that my Surge and Charge after one and two years are still going strong, I have no doubt the Blaze will hold up. 

Best Answer
0 Votes