03-15-2017 10:22
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report this post

03-15-2017 10:22
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report this post
- Who Voted for this post?
Summary of study by Cleveland Clinic:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170308145327.htm
Each participant wore:
- EKG
- Scosche Rhythm+ on arm
- two wrist based HRM, one on each wrist
the 4 wrist HRM:
- Apple Watch
- Fitbit Blaze
- Garmin Forerunner 235
- TomTom Spark Cardio
researchers then recorded HR at rest, light, moderate, and vigorous exercise on:
- treadmill
- stationary bike
- elliptical (with and without hand levers)
measurements from wearable devices were compared against EKG.
Findings:
- chest strap closely compared to EKG
- wearables good for resting HR
- most wearables acceptable for treadmill
- most wearables fairly inaccurate for cycling and elliptical
- Apple Watch only wearable accurate on elliptical without hand levers
- all wearables became inaccurate with increasing intensity levels, except for Apple Watch
Bottom line:
- chest strap is best if you need or want to monitor HR during exercise
- wearables don't provide complete picture of HR
- wearables equally over and under estimate HR
- most accurate on treadmill at low intensity, worst on elliptical at high intensity
- wearables aren't measuring what the heart does, unlike EKG and chest strap
- larger studies needed
Hoping more details will be released after the researchers present their findings at the conference this weekend.
Aria, Fitbit MobileTrack on iOS. Previous: Flex, Force, Surge, Blaze
03-15-2017 12:42
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Permalink
- Report this post



