12-26-2013 11:32
12-26-2013 11:32
Most of my workouts are high intensity interval training. I currently use a heart rate monitor that is almost ten years old. I want to find a monitor that can be used as a timer for interval training (e.g., work 30 secs, rest 60 secs) and continuously record my heart rate during work and rest sessions for my interval training (so if during my 30 secs of work, the monitor records a BPM and then during the 60 secs of rest, the monitor records another BPM).
Anyone have recommendations for a HRM that does that?
Thanks.
James
12-26-2013 11:50
12-26-2013 11:50
You can look into Polar. They are a good brand and many different models.
When you decide Google Polar Heart Rate Monitor Copon Code and you can get a discount at Heartratemonitorsusa.com
Wendy | CA | Moto G6 Android
Want to discuss ways to increase your activity? Visit the Lifestyle Forum
12-26-2013 17:17
12-26-2013 17:17
Are you looking for a HRM which will give you a total plot of your activity minute by minute ?
My Polar rs300x gives me the total time in each Zone when I sync with the Polar website. I can't break it down to the time periods you require, if that is your need...
Others may contribute and we will find a solution.
12-26-2013 17:48
12-26-2013 17:48
I you are looking for continuous HR monitoring and lots of other helpful telemetry that only you can decide if you need, take a look at the Garmin Forerunner 620 or the Garmin Forerunner 220.
I have the 620 for intervals and long distance running and the metrics are great depending on your particular level of involvement. Granted these are very high end devices that include GPS for a lot of their functionality.
12-27-2013 06:51
12-27-2013 06:51
I use a Polar FT4- very accurate and well priced 🙂
12-27-2013 07:39
12-27-2013 07:39
I think you'd be better off looking for a smartphone app and a basic HRM that can talk to it. Runtastic Pro is quite versatile, so is Digifit iCardio. If you have a recent smartphone (iPhone or Android), a BLE-compatible HRM would be a good choice (BLE = Bluetooth Low Energy, aka Bluetooth 4.0 or Bluetooth Smart, it's what Fitbit trackers use to communicate with your computer and/or your mobile device).
I have the Polar H7 chest belt and the Mio Alpha watch. Both are BLE devices and work with my Nexus 4. I find the Mio Alpha more comfortable and practical, but both are accurate and work as advertised.
Dominique | Finland
Ionic, Aria, Flyer, TrendWeight | Windows 7, OS X 10.13.5 | Motorola Moto G6 (Android 9), iPad Air (iOS 12.4.4)
Take a look at the Fitbit help site for further assistance and information.
12-27-2013 09:56
12-27-2013 09:56
12-27-2013 13:01
12-27-2013 13:01
Like Dominque, I use a BLE heart rate monitor and smartphone app. I am using the Polar H7 chest strap, but I got that before the Mio Alpha was available. Or at least before I knew it was. I personally don't mind the chest strap that much, but I can see the appeal of not needing to use one.
I use an iPhone and one of these to mount it on my wrist while I run. I prefer that to an (upper) arm band because I can glance down at stats or a heart rate graph when I want. But that is more practical on longer, paced runs then when doing short HIIT training.
My personal preference is Digifit iCardio, while Dominque likes it for assesment tests and Runtastic Pro for actual runs. The basic iCardio is free, but has in-app upgrades to support sensors like HRM or to create your own custom workouts or perform fitness tests. You'd want the upgrades. You can then define your HIIT intervals and it will give you audio cues for transitions. For example, define:
It seems iCardio measures and stores your HR every 6 seconds. So the graph you get afterwards would let you pretty easily see each 30 and 60 second interval. But it won't directly give you the average HR for each interval. It will give average HR and pace for each "split", but those have to be defined as either based on distance or time. Time based splits are in whole minutes, so you can't set it to 30 seconds. Nor can you auto-split based on work-out interval transitions. Since it does record it every 6 seconds, you'd be able to figure it out though.
If Runtastic Pro will give you avg HR and pace on 30 second intervals, you may like that. I'll let Dominque chime in on what Runtastic Pro supports.
With iCardio you can see the graph of the changes in your HR. In fact, you can see it live in real-time on the iPhone. So with the above wrist mount you could even glance at that during your walk intervals.
Just thought of another option: instead of auto-split based on time or distance, you could turn off auto split and enable a big lap button. Then tap that with each transition. You'd then get split statistics based on the 30 and 60 second intervals.
Digitfit includes a free website account to upload data. They do have a paid subscription available, but the free level already does more than I use. Plus it links to Fitbit, so each of my runs automatically creates an "activity" record in my Fitbit account and overrides the calories that Fitbit estimated for the same time period.
I'm happy with iCardio, but while I do intervals it is more like couch to 5k training intervals, not HIIT. I just did my first 5K in Oct and my second in Dec, so I'm very much a beginner runner and you could be looking for different features than me.
I'll let Dominque elaborate on what he likes better about Runtastic Pro.
Features I would like iCardio to have that it does not yet:
As a newbie, my needs could be very different than yours. But overall I am pleased with iCardio.
01-02-2014 15:27
01-02-2014 15:27
Sam | USA
Fitbit One, Macintosh, IOS
Accepting solutions is your way of passing your solution onto others and improving everybody’s Fitbit experience.
01-02-2014 15:29
01-02-2014 15:29
Sam | USA
Fitbit One, Macintosh, IOS
Accepting solutions is your way of passing your solution onto others and improving everybody’s Fitbit experience.
01-03-2014 05:17
01-03-2014 05:17
You can also program the iCardio intervals by distance, so for example you can configure a warm up period then repeating sets of 1/4 mile runs followed by 1/8 mile walks, then a cool down period. Most of my training is done via time intervals though, such as sets of 2 1/2 minute run followed by 1 minute walk. The program is very flexible in what you define though.
As Syslam mentioned, the H7 also links with some gym equipment. I've used it with Precor and Startec treadmills but it may do others as well. And it will do that while at the same time letting iCardio track the HR. So you get the best of both worlds. Pretty neat.
01-03-2014 06:51
01-03-2014 06:51
I haven't seen anyone suggest the Timex HRM's. I have used most of the brands out there, Polar, Garmin, Timex, and a handfull of others like Oregon Scientific, Bike Nashbar, Forte to name a few. By FAR my favorite was my Timex, it was easy to use, tracked multiple zones, and if I was so inclined I could download all the data to my computer and plot and track it. To be fair and in the interest of full disclosure I received my first Garmin at Christmas and haven't been able to really figure it out yet. It frustrates me to have to read for hours to figure out how to display my HR, Distance, and time on the same screen and frankly haven't even been able to see my HR at all yet so I'm not even sure if the HR function is working on it.
As other posters have mentioned, if you have a smart phone you can link it to your ANT equipped HRM and use the better metrics offered by some of the Apps out there than the HRM watches are capable of supporting. I'm not a smart phone user but my wife swears by her iphone apps and religiously downloads her Garmin HRM / GPS data.
01-06-2014 07:28
01-06-2014 07:28
I have a Timex one. I wasn't sure if I was going to like it so I didn't want to shell out a huge amount of money for a Polar. Plus, I thought the Polar ones were ugly and I used to love my (many) Ironman watches. I like the Timex but I need to reset it. It always tells me that I have 0 minutes in the zone because I have it set wrong. It does a good job of tracking my HR during my runs, and then I hit the split and track my weight lifting as a second time so I can see the difference. Wore it today for the first time with the Fitbit and the run came in pretty close when I did the calorie calculation. I was happy about that.