08-28-2017
10:54
- last edited on
08-28-2017
11:01
by
FitbitCommunity
08-28-2017
10:54
- last edited on
08-28-2017
11:01
by
FitbitCommunity
Great, all these fancy new features, but it still can't tell me my cadence while running.
Moderator edit: Clarified subject
08-28-2017 11:13 - edited 08-29-2017 15:24
08-28-2017 11:13 - edited 08-29-2017 15:24
@Boost01 To clarify, Fitbit Ionic will show you real-time and average exercise cues for the entire duration of your multi-sport exercise mode.
Hope that helps!
08-28-2017 11:29
08-28-2017 11:29
If I understood the question as it was originally posted, @Boost01 was asking if the Ionic could display the current step per minute cadence while on a run. If I got that correct, then the multi-sport exercise mode link doesn't answer the question (or it is pretty well hidden and I didn't find it).
My guess is the answer is "no".
08-28-2017 11:38
08-28-2017 11:38
@ErickFitbit, not sure how that is in any way relevant to the topic at hand. All serious fitness trackers seem to be able to tell the wearer their "steps per minute" AKA cadence. Nothing in the material released so far has told me that the Ionic can do this.
For such a simple feature that has been requested for well over 2 years now, this is a BIG miss on the part of Fitbit.
08-28-2017 15:01
08-28-2017 15:01
@Boost01 @shipo Ionic can display pace, which is time per mile. If you'd like to see steps per minute as an option on Ionic, I recommend creating an Ionic specific Feature Suggestion and voting for it. The more votes this gets, the more likely it is to be considered for future release.
08-28-2017 15:04
08-28-2017 15:04
I'm thinking to download the SDK to see if I cannot build my own Cadence feature. 🙂
08-28-2017 15:30
08-28-2017 15:30
@ErickFitbit What makes you think that will work any better now than it has for the last 2 years of trying. You won't get me buying another Fitbit until this is on the features list.
08-28-2017 17:09
08-28-2017 17:09
@Boost01 wrote:@ErickFitbit What makes you think that will work any better now than it has for the last 2 years of trying. You won't get me buying another Fitbit until this is on the features list.
I'm curious as I coach a lot of runners; why do you feel so strongly about needing cadence?
08-28-2017 17:36
08-28-2017 17:36
@shipo basically I want to do whatever I can to ensure I am running as efficiently and safely as possible.
I don't want to get injured from over striding and I don't want to waste energy as I increase my distances.I also would like to ensure my running form is consistent even when I am tired out.
08-28-2017 20:09
08-28-2017 20:09
Agree. Cadence is an important metric. When I was a newer runner I tried to go faster by simply lengthening strides and messed up my knee after an 8 mile run. I feel a lot of newer runners make this mistake.
I've exported the TPX files from fitbit workouts to see if they track this but the data isn't included. I've never seen anything in Fitbit that suggests cadence is even tracked. Too bad. It's right in the wheel house for a step tracker!
08-28-2017 22:47 - edited 08-28-2017 23:24
08-28-2017 22:47 - edited 08-28-2017 23:24
Huh? A flagship/top of the line $300 device from Fitbit can't/wont/doesn't do simple run cadence?
Its a shame that Fitbit isn't providing basic running stat(s) that competitors have been happily doing so for many years.
Fitbit doesn't seem to get it. Can't understand why this logic continues to persist.
08-29-2017 04:59 - edited 08-29-2017 05:01
08-29-2017 04:59 - edited 08-29-2017 05:01
@Boost01 wrote:@shipo basically I want to do whatever I can to ensure I am running as efficiently and safely as possible.
I don't want to get injured from over striding and I don't want to waste energy as I increase my distances.I also would like to ensure my running form is consistent even when I am tired out.
I agree, but how does cadence help you in that quest?
Regarding "over striding", I teach my runners to ignore cadence, that's way over thinking things; simply keep their "nose over their toes" and they cannot over stride.
08-29-2017 12:42
08-29-2017 12:42
@shipo wrote:
@Boost01 wrote:@shipo basically I want to do whatever I can to ensure I am running as efficiently and safely as possible.
I don't want to get injured from over striding and I don't want to waste energy as I increase my distances.I also would like to ensure my running form is consistent even when I am tired out.
I agree, but how does cadence help you in that quest?
Regarding "over striding", I teach my runners to ignore cadence, that's way over thinking things; simply keep their "nose over their toes" and they cannot over stride.
@shipo wrote:
@Boost01 wrote:@shipo basically I want to do whatever I can to ensure I am running as efficiently and safely as possible.
I don't want to get injured from over striding and I don't want to waste energy as I increase my distances.I also would like to ensure my running form is consistent even when I am tired out.
I agree, but how does cadence help you in that quest?
Regarding "over striding", I teach my runners to ignore cadence, that's way over thinking things; simply keep their "nose over their toes" and they cannot over stride.
Some people like to quantify and track their progress/data over time. That is the point of a fitness device. There's no reason why an advanced pedometer with an accelerometer can't track this. I agree with you that the cadence metric shouldn't be taken alone, but some people find it useful part of quantifying their workouts.
08-29-2017 13:10 - edited 08-29-2017 13:11
08-29-2017 13:10 - edited 08-29-2017 13:11
@SunsetRunner wrote:Some people like to quantify and track their progress/data over time. That is the point of a fitness device. There's no reason why an advanced pedometer with an accelerometer can't track this. I agree with you that the cadence metric shouldn't be taken alone, but some people find it useful part of quantifying their workouts.
I would argue following simple dictums like "Nose over toes" to correct stride issues are far more important, and once stride issues are taken care of, cadence is utterly irrelevant unless or until one progresses all of the way through the ranks of runners and enters the rarified world of elites.
One of the most common things I run up against with new runners is folks who read stuff like, "Most world class distance runners race with a cadence of 180; therefore I must also strive to hit 180." Yeah, about that; a few comments:
The point I'm trying to make, is cadence is a very-very poor metric to use for training, even for elite athletes. For a non-elite to focus on it they will virtually always do so at the exclusion of something else which is more important, and that will usually lead to injury.
08-29-2017 15:22
08-29-2017 15:22
I don't think that's the point of this thread, really.
The fact is, and there's no way around it, is that several competing and related devices provide it. The recent Garmin, Polar, and Suunto products provide it. AW2 has apps that provide it. Wahoo Tickr run has it. Foot pods provide it. Several smart phones natively provide it to their fitness apps (ex: samsung galaxy).
So even if cadence is a big pile of BS, this thread is evidence that people care about it, have asked fitbit for it (there are several requests for it in the feature forum). Fitbit hasn't yet provided it (yet.)Other products do. Personally, I'm still buying the Ionic even if they don't provide cadence, but others will. It's low hanging fruit for Fitbit.
08-29-2017 15:24
08-29-2017 15:24
I completely respect your opinion. I just think it's easier for fitbit to do this and helps a perception that they are focused on fitness metrics.
08-29-2017 15:40 - edited 08-29-2017 15:42
08-29-2017 15:40 - edited 08-29-2017 15:42
@SunsetRunner @Boost01 @steveting99 Please share the Ionic specific Feature Suggestion idea once you've created one so others who are interested may vote for it. I appreciate your feedback.
08-29-2017 23:28
08-29-2017 23:28
There are several requests for including cadence in the Features suggestion thread. Examples are:
Real time cadence screen in fitbit blaze
Measure Cadence for Fitbit Surge
Cadence and stride length in run summary
Calculate cadence in cycling with Surge
Would you like me to include another thread feature request, just for the Iconic? Since the Iconic doesn't have cadence feature - just like every Fitbit device?
Rather than having a single thread for the cadence feature on ALL relevant Fitbit devices where the vote count can be high, there are multiple threads spreading out the request for cadence. This fans out the vote count and making the feature request appear small or negligible. Note that one of the threads only has 2 votes. Nice way to sweep away the request so it appears that no one cares about it.
08-30-2017 13:57 - edited 08-30-2017 14:00
08-30-2017 13:57 - edited 08-30-2017 14:00
@steveting99 I've merged the redundant threads from your list, which adds their cumulative vote counts together. I understand that it's easy to adopt a negative perspective around something like this, but in reality we use the Feature Suggestion forum to advocate on behalf of customers - it's a major part of our role. We don't send anyone there to dismiss their interests, and we do everything we can to guide users to existing ideas, and prevent duplicates.
A new request specific to Ionic will be valuable when we deliver this information to developers. We will also reference the more long-running threads that you mentioned, but a new request for this product is more effective for leveraging development resources.
08-30-2017 20:50
08-30-2017 20:50
Matt,
Appreciate merging the various cadence feature request threads into one. There's still a few more such as:
Real time cadence screen in fitbit blaze
Calculate cadence in cycling with Surge
sync with third party speed and cadence sensors for biking
It's interesting that the request for cadence falls across many of Fitbit's product line, and is not limited to just the Iconic.
Current products such as Charge 2, Alta HR, Blaze and the soon to be dead as the Dodo bird - Surge should have the cadence feature. If Fibit's R&D forgot to include a common feature implementation across multiple products, there needs to be re-think on how engineering resources are deployed on a common platform.