09-12-2016
00:38
- last edited on
01-26-2021
06:23
by
JuanJoFitbit
09-12-2016
00:38
- last edited on
01-26-2021
06:23
by
JuanJoFitbit
I just got my new Charge 2 on saturday so I've not tested it very long, but the calorie count on it seems WAY off. The BMR on it seems correct for my height/weight (1555) but then the calories burned when simply walking a bit are way too high.
Saturday, I went shopping for a few hours that got me around 10k steps in total. I also did a kickboxing workout (268 cals) and went biking (219 cals) and Fitbit calculated 3000 (!!!) calories burned that day. That just can't be right, when my BMR is only 1555 I should've burned 1445 cals with exercise according to Fitbit. Subtract the kickboxing and biking (which is way higher intensity than the walking, calories for that seem correct) from that and that leaves 958 calories burned for walking +/- 10.000 steps.
Has anyone else had this problem? I've Googled for a bit and it seems it was a problem back when the first Charge HR was released too, but I couldn't find a solution. I love the Fitbit and the app but it seems when it takes the constant HR into account when you're not very fit it just overestimates by a WAY too high number. If I ate what Fitbit is telling me I can eat, I'd gain an incredible amount of weight in a very short time.
The numbers I got when I was just counting steps without heart rate (using my phone, before I got my Fitibit) was way closer to the actual number I should be getting for something as easy-going as walking while shopping.
Moderator edit: format
09-22-2016 08:00
09-22-2016 08:00
@bernardmac wrote:I am agreeing with you! The calorie burn for me is way too high...
My previous reply wasn't directed at you but at curxxx. I just hadn't found the quote button and you posted a tad bit earlier than me so it looked like I was talking to you. Sorry for the confusion.
10-09-2016 11:51
10-09-2016 11:51
I have experienced the same pattern.
I have used the Alta for 7 months, until i recently lost it. So i upgraded to the Charge 2.
With Alta- regular day of work, errands, walking my dogs, 10k steps= approximately 2100 to 2200 calories burned.
With Charge @2- same regular day, same errands, same walking with dogs, same 10k steps= 2500 to 2600 calories burned.@2- same regular day, same errands, same walking with dogs, same 10k steps= 2500 to 2600 calories burned.
Thats a big difference for me!
If i turn the heart rate monitor off on the Charg 2- the numbers are more in line with what i got with Alta.
I figure that since my heart rate is normally a bit elevated, and Fitbit uses average data for a "normal" heart rate, it thinks that i am exercesing/ straining myself a lot more than i actually am. Just because i am stressed and drank some caffeine, doesnt mean i am in the "fat burn zone."
Try turning off the heart rate monitor- see what numbers it gives you.
10-09-2016 11:58
10-09-2016 11:58
10-09-2016 13:22
10-09-2016 13:22
10-09-2016 13:40
10-09-2016 13:40
10-12-2016 06:20
10-12-2016 06:20
10-12-2016 10:29
10-12-2016 10:29
10-12-2016 10:43
10-12-2016 10:43
10-12-2016 11:46
10-12-2016 11:46
10-12-2016 11:48
10-12-2016 11:48
11-13-2016 00:48
11-13-2016 00:48
12-22-2016 16:10
12-22-2016 16:10
I got my fit bit charge 2 a couple of weeks ago. My calories burned is 10,000+. I know this is wrong. I have had numerous fit bits and never had this problem.
01-02-2017 19:22
01-02-2017 19:22
So was here a solution to this post? Other than getting it replaced?
01-02-2017 19:31
01-02-2017 19:31
01-02-2017 19:33
01-02-2017 19:33
Had it replaced several times, still the same issue. Just turned off the heart rate monitor, seems to be a more realistic number.
01-02-2017 19:37
01-02-2017 19:37
01-03-2017 03:22
01-03-2017 03:22
As a sports nutritionist I can 100% guarantee that the calorie burn numbers my charge 2 display are significantly higher than what is realistic. It is my job to track food intake & create accurate meal plans for athletes, and from my own fitbit, its overestimating my daily calories by at least 500 per day and upwards of 1000 (I've had it for 2 weeks). All of my account data is correct, and I have set my goal to maintain weight, but if I ate as much as the app told me to, I would have easily gained weight since owning the device.
I have not tried disabling the HR function yet though.
01-03-2017 07:04
01-03-2017 07:04
01-03-2017 07:35
01-03-2017 07:35
About a year ago I had a Surge and eventually got rid of it becuase I was using the calories burned function to determine intake for cutting/bulking/maintaining. Turns out the number wasn't near accurate enough.
I recently purchased a Charge HR 2. Its in the mail. Crossing my fingers that they improve the calories burned calculations. Based on y'all's experiences, it doesn't seem that they have yet. Bummer.
01-05-2017 03:41
01-05-2017 03:41
Just as an update, with the HR function turned off, my caloric burn for the day seems very accurate.
Fitbit might need to change their algorithm with HR and calories burnt or something.