09-26-2020
07:35
- last edited on
10-13-2021
09:13
by
JuanJoFitbit
09-26-2020
07:35
- last edited on
10-13-2021
09:13
by
JuanJoFitbit
How accurate is the HRV in the health metrics?
Moderator edit: updated subject for clarity
12-15-2022 14:35
12-15-2022 14:35
12-15-2022 15:24
12-15-2022 15:24
The Fitbit app in terms of HRV is nonsense and a pure sales pusher. Fitbit is able to monitor these 13 pages but unable to make a clear statement about this failure. Shame on you, fitbit. You play with our health in a bad manner with your false health figures. I am out here.
12-15-2022 16:46
12-15-2022 16:46
12-16-2022 05:17
12-16-2022 05:17
12-16-2022 05:41
12-16-2022 05:41
12-18-2022 05:45
12-18-2022 05:45
@Parkersspace. Thank you for the link to the Fitbit study review article.
However, your comment about Fitbit being more accurate than Apple is misleading, as this WHOLE THREAD is about Fitbit’s unreliable HRV readings.
NOTHING mentioned in the study about Fitbit HRV.
Only looked at Steps, Energy Expenditure, Sleep time.
12-18-2022 06:02
12-18-2022 06:02
12-18-2022 06:11
12-18-2022 06:11
12-18-2022 06:14
12-18-2022 06:14
12-18-2022 10:54
12-18-2022 10:54
12-18-2022 14:06
12-18-2022 14:06
12-18-2022 20:34
12-18-2022 20:34
So....Glad.... I.... Found... This.....
Lol.
12-18-2022 21:58
12-18-2022 21:58
I think we all know by now that capturing a correct HRV is not really possible with this tool. All we can do is understand that it's all relative. What matters is any big change. I believe that's true, mine doesn't change much it goes up a few points and down a few points based on my lifestyle habits. I think to get an accurate HIV you have to be hooked up to machines and capture detailed data from all times of the day, not just sleeping.
12-19-2022 01:50
12-19-2022 01:50
12-19-2022 04:30 - edited 12-19-2022 04:32
12-19-2022 04:30 - edited 12-19-2022 04:32
I made a small comparison of overnight HRV from two different devices (Garmin Fenix 7 and Fitbit Sense 2). Despite values being slightly different (the yellow line shows the difference), the overall HRV trend is very similar. The biggest difference however is the personal range area which for Fitbit is kept much wider. For the last 4 weeks, I had only one record of being below my personal range while it happened several times on Garmin (and aligned pretty well with my being ill). As for accuracy - this really depends on the data set (time domain and values) as well as on the calculation method so it's impossible to compare the accuracy of any of those readings without analysing a vast amount of R-R intervals (and there's no way to retrieve that). Visually, both readings seem to follow a very similar trend. That makes me assume that overnight HRV data is probably accurate enough for the purpose its being used.
I don't pay much attention to HRV but this result is actually not too bad if HRV is considered relative rather than absolute. The only thing I would adjust is the personal range size and presentation (the range is unified for the entire visible chart regardless of the time domain).
12-23-2022 15:03
12-23-2022 15:03
The sleep data on Charge 5 is good. No wrist wearable can capture all the metrics to do accurate HRV. Not Apple, not Garmin. Each have their own algorithms based on what data they can capture.
Charge 5 is poor. With my readings being between 10 and 19 (that seem to be directly tied to my sleep patterns and heart rate) I knew it was wrong.
I bought an ECG grade chest strap and get consistent readings of 53 and 57. I can also get a reading of the balance between PSNS and SNS.
I recommend you use your Fitbit for what it’s good at - monitoring sleep and exercise - and buy a chest strap if accurate HRV is important to you. It collects data points from your heart. You can’t do that with your Fitbit. You can pair a chest strap with the free eHRV app. There is also good HRV info on their site.
12-23-2022 15:05
01-01-2023 16:33 - edited 01-01-2023 16:47
01-01-2023 16:33 - edited 01-01-2023 16:47
Wrist devices all use similar algorithms. T.Parker posted graphs from different devices all nesting into each other. They factor in length of sleep and percentage of sleeping heart rate below resting heart rate. Wrist devices can’t capture the metrics required to give an accurate HRV.
Fitbit gives me HRV of between 12 and 23 depending on sleep and heart rate. My ECG grade chest strap averages 56.
I had a heavy NYE and had a long sleep with low heart rate and got my highest HRV score (37) from Fitbit and my readiness score said excellent.
My chest strap gave me my lowest score ever (50) and told me my SNS (stress) was high and gave me my lowest readiness score ever.
I feel terrible. I believe my H10 chest strap.
I tried to post screen shots but they were rejected
01-02-2023 02:59
01-02-2023 02:59
01-02-2023 17:03 - edited 01-08-2023 16:13
01-02-2023 17:03 - edited 01-08-2023 16:13
Fitbit (blue) HRV vs ECG grade chest strap (orange) HRV. No correlation whatsoever.
readings taken on the same day at the same time on the same person. The morning HRV reading from Fitbit and the reading from an ECG grade chest strap 15 minutes later.