07-28-2014 11:53
07-28-2014 11:53
How much weight is considered safe to lose per week?
01-11-2016 22:31
01-11-2016 22:31
01-11-2016 22:33
01-11-2016 22:33
@Larryb1040 wrote:
Question how do you tighten up lose belly skin? Sent from myiPhone
depending on amount - many have found that when they started weight lifting and eating in surplus to pack on more muscle - the skin tighten up also as it repaired.
along with that though was more protein usually - and amino acids used in all cells to some degree - so that probably helped.
So that probably means the longer method of eating at maintenance and lifting could likely illicit a repair also.
01-12-2016 07:14
01-12-2016 07:14
Larry, It all depends on your age, how much belly fat and how long the skin was streched. I worked for a surgical Bariatric program, people who lost alot of weight had to undergo another surgery to remove the excess skin, or pannus abdomen. once the skin is stretched for a long period of time it's very hard to tighten up again.
01-12-2016 08:16
01-12-2016 08:16
I'm a proponent of Intermittent Fasting of which there are many calories. Many women report this is not as effective, but the more l lean, the more I see it's not just the fasting, but that in combination with a good diet. I've been spending a lot of time on a website that someone else from these boards recommended. A Dr. Jason Fung is a kidney specilist working out of Toronto Candada and he has used fasting as a method of not only curing obesity, but type 2 diabetes. You can spend days reading his blogs and watching his lectures, but the bottom line is: Insulin makes you fat. The effort then is to reduce the insulin.
Different foods elicit different insulin responses, but its not that simple (what ever is?). Carbs elicit the most, but this seems to be mitigated in the presence of fiber. Protien is pretty high too, especially whey protein, but that's mitigated by low blood glucose and slow digestion. Good fats like olive oil, coconut oil and even butter have the lowest insulin response. Fructose is bad because it isn't metabolized into blood glucose, but directly sent to the liver where it's forced into fat IN the liver and that quickly drives up insulin resistance.
The answer seems to be combining some foods, eliminating others and reducing the amount of insulin and the amount of time insulin is produced. When you fast, once blood glucose is low, insulin isn't produced giving your cells time to regain their sensitivity to it. When you do eat, you should eat high quality fats with protiens and high fiber carbs.
Other phenomenom of fasting isn't it's lack of impact on Basil Metabolic Rate (the rate at which your body burns calorie just surviving). When you do pure calorie restriction, you body will reduce the amount of calories it needs by slowing down your metabolism. This causes the typical yo-yo dieting because its easier to put on weight when you stop restricting calories. But when you fast, your body turns to fat stores to get it's energy and it will take the energy it needs from the fat rather than slowing down your metabolism. This seems all to be triggered by insulin and a few other hormones, but during fasting, your metabolism actually increases.
There is a worry about lack of nutrients and muscle burning when fasting, but that seems to be avoided. There is a genius record of a scotsman who fasted for over a year. He started out at something over 400 lbs and only drank water and other non-caloric drinks, but didn't eat a bite. He lost down to 181 lbs and during this process, they continually tested his blood and everything was good. Muscle loss seems to be more of a problem with calorie restriction vs fasting. When fasting, muscle loss is a very tempory effect, but is soon haulted once the body becomes a fat burner. It aslo doesn't occur at all until after 60 hours of fasting.
Studies also show that the effect of exercise for fat burning when fasting is small. That doesn't mean you shouldn't exercise as there are many other benefits to be achived through it, but it doesn't significantly add to the amount of fat burned.
I'm still reading blogs and watching video's from this site, but what I like is all the actual scientific studies that are refernced in this body of work. The other thing is corralation studies are used sparingly as he regards them mostly as garbage and he debunks quite a few of them. I encourage anyone with a desire to get fit to study this and other sites. Here is a link: https://intensivedietarymanagement.com/
01-12-2016 08:18
01-12-2016 08:18
01-21-2016 05:13
01-21-2016 05:13
Thanks for all the votes folks, I have noticed that this 1-2 lbs a week has paid off as I lost 35 lbs and I am keeping it off.. I have to admit the winter months are hard because I love the comfort foods.. But wearing the fitbit and knowing the weight melts off the more active I become makes this all worth while. Keep up the good work no matter how much weight comes off per week.. Sometimes it comes off easier than others. Just keep the chin up and keep on stepping. The more active you are the more you will like yourself and find moving in life a lot easier.. Have a great day everyone!
01-28-2016 10:25
01-28-2016 10:25
In my studies as a healthcare worker, they have a established or stated that 1LB per week is a healthy and reasonable goal. This varies on lifestyle. If you decrease the calories intake and exercise more, this number will fluctuate. If you are detoxing (ex. Master Cleanse), you can lose up to 5-10LBs per week. If you sit in a hot sauna daily for 15-20 minutes, you can lose 5-10 LBs per week. Ultimately, you want to make sure you listen to your body and pay attention to your energy levels so you are aware if your practices are too strenuous. Further, you want to make sure you are losing fat and not muscle. Do your research and try out different methods of weight loss to see what works best and find the system that you can maintain over time. Have fun with it. If you find yourself not wanting to go to the gym you may be over-doing it. You want to stay motivated and look forard to keeping healthy and not asscoiate the gym with boredom or pain. Best of luck in your endeavors.
01-28-2016 12:19
01-28-2016 12:19
Don't think about that number. It doesn't define you. Go by the way your clothes fit / feel.
Yes, this. I am working to get back into my size 8 pants. That is when I looked my healthiest.
01-28-2016 14:15
01-28-2016 14:15
1 1/2-2 pounds per week
02-21-2016 09:17 - edited 02-21-2016 09:18
02-21-2016 09:17 - edited 02-21-2016 09:18
02-21-2016 10:48
02-21-2016 10:48
I wish I could take credit for it. I came across that well put saying from "The Abs Diet". It was one of the first books I read that suggested that eating had a "thermic effect" (calorie burning) and that some foods were better than others due to a combination of factors such as lower glycemic load, micronutrients and healthy fats.
Scientists have a very, very long way to go in understanding why some folks can pig out at will and others will gain weight just smelling bacon or apple pie. Even the "calorie is a calorie" adage has come under attack recently, as scientists and those that come up with the labels for our foods are just guessing at the actual caloric value a product would have. The only real way to assess the caloric value is to measure the heat required to burn the entire thing up. As you might imagine, a veggie pattie or a beef pattie - they will be like snowflakes in caloric value. Each beef pattie will require a different amount of heat to burn it up, as will each veggie pattie. All we can do is jot down the best information we have and hope we're close.
02-22-2016 08:18
02-22-2016 08:18
I wanted to comment on the base calories that people are eating. TikiPaka is right, 1500 calories does not sound like enough given the goal weight. I have read several posts that indicate that people are not eating enough base calories. My friend, who is a personal trainer, said, you should take your goal weight and add a zero, this should be your base calories for the day. So for example; my goal weight is 160 lbs, so 1600 calories per day. I have noticed that this is pretty close to what the fitbit dashboard calculates for me as my starting calories for the day, given that I want to lose 2lbs a week. My aim is to burn at least 2600 calories per day for a 1000 calorie deficit per day, 7000 calorie deficit per week. From Jan 6th to feb 9th I lost 18lbs of fat, I say fat because this is the difference between my current weight and lean body mass over this time period. I am not eating less in the traditional sense of "dieting," but eating 5 small meals of around 250 - 350 calories. What I am finding is that I have to move more to reach the 2600 burn in calories. This makes sense to me. The last couple of weeks I have plateaued, but I am not going to change the base calorie intake. If anything I will move more, try a different exercise or change the food I am eating. One other note about my goal weight. This is a step in the process, I probably could achieve much lower and may adjust as I reach that weight. I want to be realistic in 33 years of "dieting" I want to set myself up for success. I am sure someone can comment on the best method to calculate your goal weight based on body composition, just make the end goal realistic for your body and do not compare to anyone else.